High Rankings Advisor: Rankings in AltaVista and Google - Issue No. 035November 20, 2002 ________________________________________________________
~~~IN TODAY'S ADVISOR~~~ *Introductory Comments: ----> Successful Seminar *Search Engine Marketing: ----> Rankings in AltaVista and Google ----> Everyone's Doing It So It Must Be Okay *This Week's Sponsor: ----> Webnautics: Custom Programming/Scripts *Guest Article/Case Study: ----> Links Are Good for Business *Stuff You Might Like ----> Recap of Past Stuff *Advisor Wrap-Up: ----> Gobble-gobble ________________________________________________________ ~~~Introductory Comments~~~ Hey everyone! A special "hi" goes out to all of you who attended my seminar on Monday. It went really well! Even those who already knew a lot about SEO said that they learned things, plus it reaffirmed the stuff they already knew. Since things went so well this time, I'm thinking of holding another one. Perhaps in May -- I'll keep you posted. I was surprised to find that most of the 70 people who registered found out about it through this newsletter. Guess I can save my money on other ads next time and just publicize it here! There was some great feedback on the evaluation forms, which I'll be looking at closely to help me make future seminars even better! Thanks to all who came. It was nice to meet you! Plus a big thanks to Lee Laughlin from Fearless Media, without whom there wouldn't have been a seminar, nor would it have run so smoothly! Okay...enough seminar talk. I've got some Q&A, plus an awesome case study article written by a business owner friend of mine who found a great way to build traffic, credibility and search engine rankings for her "moonwalk" rental site. Be sure you read it all the way through as there are some great tips you might be able to use on your own site. On to the good stuff... ~~~Search Engine Marketing Issues~~~ ++Rankings in AltaVista and Google++ From: Jackie Jahosky Hi Jill - I always look forward to your newsletter and now I have a couple of questions about SEO. I submitted to AltaVista almost 3 months ago. I know you always say to wait at least three months, but here's the thing: I also signed up about 5 URLs using their express inclusion and I get hardly any traffic at all from them. However, the same URLs provide me 20X the traffic on Google & MSN. Is that just the way it is now? Do people just not use AltaVista anymore? Should I care that AltaVista has not indexed my entire site? My second question is this: I optimized my pages myself and have gotten page one listings on Google for *some* of my most important keywords. However for some of my other important keywords the same optimization did not even get me in the top 20 pages on Google. I'm wondering why this could be since I did the same optimization for those words. Could it be that those words are just more competitive? I read somewhere that pages that are also listed in ODP get a boost in rankings on Google. One page that is doing well happens to be the same page (which is an inner page & not my main URL) that got listed in ODP. I have been unsuccessful at getting my root URL listed in ODP. So, I guess my question is how do I get my other important keywords high rankings on Google? Let me know what you think. Jackie Jahosky Specialty-Lights.com ~~~Jill's Response~~~ Hi Jackie, It seems you sorta answered your own questions already, and you're definitely on the right track. But let me just expand on your conclusions a bit and hopefully give you some ideas of what you can do to further your optimization efforts. As far as AltaVista goes, you are correct: they don't seem to bring much traffic these days, even when you have many top-ten rankings. Of course, they just reinvented themselves (again) a couple of weeks ago (see last week's article </issue034.htm#seonews2>). Therefore, it's impossible to say what the future holds for them. If they start to provide some high-quality, relevant search results and spend some time/money to market themselves to the searching public, perhaps we will see more referrals from them in our logs. As part of their new release, they are attempting to do more crawling and refreshing of sites. You may find that your additional pages will be added soon. If not, I wouldn't worry about it at this point. If you start to see your paid-inclusion URLs bringing more traffic, you can decide at that point if you'd like to pay for some additional pages. Personally, I don't understand why AV thinks their database is worth more to be included in than the other engines', and therefore I have not used their paid-inclusion service. If they lower their price to be more in line with what they're worth, I might give it a whirl in the future. As to your Google problem, you are correct that the DMOZ link to the inner page of your site might be what's giving it the added boost it needs to rank highly for its keyword phrases. Google does seem to like DMOZ links, plus the DMOZ database is used by tons of small directories all over the Net. Very often you'll see these other directory links showing up in a backward-links check. It's a shame that it's such a pain to get listed in DMOZ these days, because it really can be helpful. At any rate, since you do have one page listed in DMOZ, it's not surprising that they won't also list your main page. Although some sites can get additional listings, it's generally not the norm. But everyone is basically in the same boat. What I suggest for your main page is to make sure you're listed in all of the other major directories such as JoeAnt <http://www.joeant.com>, GoGuides <http://www.goguides.org>, Gimpsy <http://www.gimpsy.com> and any others you can find that might be specific to your industry. If there aren't any directories like that, read today's guest article to see if perhaps it would make sense for you to create your own industry-specific directory! It's also important to note that, contrary to popular belief, Google is not simply about links. Links can definitely help, but you've got to make sure you have a good 250 words of well-written copy that's utilizing your keyword phrases a number of times. Make sure to optimize for just a couple of phrases per page, even on the main page. As I stressed to the folks who attended my seminar this week, you can't try to do everything with your main page. This is one of the biggest mistakes I see people make. Shoot for just two or three phrases and laser-focus your copy on them. It could very well be that the phrases you're having trouble with are more competitive than the ones you're ranking highly with (as you suggested). If this is the case, either forget about those words and shoot for some additional less-competitive phrases, or just keep plugging away at it. Get your copy down pat and be sure you're using the same keyword phrases in your Title tag. Good luck! Jill __________________________________________________adv. Need Affordable Custom Programming/Scripts? Call Us TODAY! __________________________________________________ Custom Software/Script Development is our ONLY business! * CUSTOM: Shopping Carts, Information Systems, Databases, etc. * We build CUSTOM Programs/Scripts to Your Specs and Your Needs. * PHP - PERL - MySQL - eCommerce Consulting * Call Bill -> 1-800-810-7270 | Call Brant -> 1-800-349-9924 * [1PM-1AM] M-F EST -- Email: <mailto:consult@webnautics.com> __________________________________________________ ~~~Next Question~~~ ++ Everyone's Doing It So It Must Be Okay++ From: Steve M. Jill Having banged on about our poor visibility on search engines, our tech team has come up with a solution which they have implemented on our sister sites. The good news is that Googlebot has come past, indexed thousands of pages and has driven (we estimate) around 40,000 extra visitors to those sites. It's now proposed that we do the same for the site I run, which is the IT site. The bad news is that what they have done is effectively cloaking - i.e., intercepting Googlebot and displaying a set of pages that the average visitor wouldn't see. When I mentioned this, I was told that "everyone does it" and that Google can't start throwing everyone out because it would lose so many sites. My preferred solution (i.e., using the traditional method of getting Googlebot to enter through the 'noframes' tag [it's a framed site]) was rejected because Googlebot would get confused because it can now read framesets. A lot of questions I know, but I feel we are stirring up trouble for the future. Steve ~~~Jill's Response~~~ When I first read Steve's email, I thought perhaps his company wasn't actually cloaking but was simply detecting older browsers and providing different content for them. (Search engine spiders are somewhat like older browsers in what they can "read.") So I asked Steve if this was the case, or were they actually intercepting Googlebot specifically (by finding out all its IPs, etc.). Steve wrote back that they were intercepting Googlebot specifically. So it seems that they are indeed IP-cloaking, which is a definite no-no with Google. It's wonderful that using this technique has gotten thousands of their pages into Google and that it's bringing tons of traffic to them. However, does that make it right? No matter how you slice it, it is against Google's published Webmaster rules, and if caught, the sites will definitely be banned. On their Webmaster FAQ page <http://www.google.com/webmasters/2.html> they say: "We will not comment on the individual reasons a page was removed and we do not offer an exhaustive list of practices that can cause removal. However, certain actions such as cloaking, writing text that can be seen by search engines but not by users, or setting up pages/links with the sole purpose of fooling search engines may result in permanent removal from our index." If you're using a throwaway domain, and don't care if it's banned, then certainly it's your company's prerogative to take that chance. The visitors and sales you make out of it for the short term may be worth the risk to you. However, if your company has created a brand with a good reputation, what does breaking the rules say about you? Perhaps it says you're daring and willing to take a risk. Or perhaps it says you're lazy and just out for a quick buck regardless of the consequences. Only your company knows what their true motivation is. However, to say they're doing it because "everyone is doing it" is not only wrong but sounds like something my kids would say! Of course, my response to that (as any good mom's) would be, "If everyone were jumping off the Empire State Building, would you do it too?" The fact is, "everyone" is *not* cloaking. Thankfully, most are actually moving away from that sort of thing. Although it may seem like an attractive option right now, since Google would prefer to keep cloaked pages out of their database, you can bet that they're working on methods to detect them. It may not be today, and it may not be tomorrow, but the party will not last forever. That you can bank on! As to your idea of using the noframes tag to place your content and links, you are correct that this is the right way to do things with a framed site. Yes, some of the engines are starting to follow the frameset code, but that's a good thing! It doesn't mean you can't use the noframes tag in addition. Those engines that can't follow framesets still need the info in the noframes tag, and those that can will probably just ignore it. Either way, you do have to optimize your pages. Optimize your noframes copy and tags on the main page, and optimize all your inner-framed pages. Make sure they have lots of great keyword-rich content and put navigational links on every page. Yeah, it's a pain in the neck to optimize for high rankings when you do it this way. But it's the most viable long-term strategy. A little hard work now, and you won't have to think about it again for years. To learn more about optimizing a framed site, please read my article here: </framedsite.htm>. Good luck convincing your pals! Jill ~~~Guest Article/Case Study~~~ ++Links Are Good for Business++ Every now and then it's a good idea to do a reality check and find out what real business owners are doing to build their site traffic and rankings. Advice from SEOs is great, but hearing from others can give us a different perspective. Today's guest article is from Scottie Claiborne, co-owner of Hullaballoo Entertainment, a company focused on family-oriented information and activities. Scottie is one smart cookie. She's got a Master's Degree in Information Technology Management and spent many years as a retail buyer before focusing on small business and the Web. So let's give Scottie a warm Advisor welcome! Guest Article Links Are Good for Business Scottie Claiborne Read the advice on SEO boards and tutorials these days and you will find a lot of information about linking. There are debates and "facts" on whom you should link to and whether reciprocal links are good or bad. The reality is that the Web is made up of links and you should link to sites that your users will find helpful. Without links, the Web would be a lonely place. Only those that could afford to buy advertising banners and pay for placement in the search engines would ever see any traffic. The Importance of Linking I have a small moonwalk rental business that was a part-time venture until last spring. When I decided to do it full-time, I turned to our Web site to help establish and market the brand. Some attention to search engine optimization paid off, and the site was soon #1 for our local keywords. What I did not expect was the national and international traffic. Before long, I had phone and email inquiries from all over the country. Even though our region is clearly identified, people wanted to know who rented moonwalks in their area. As a service, I started to make a list of rental companies that I could refer others to. In order to lessen the calls and emails I was receiving, I posted my list on the site and invited other companies to send me their information. I started an aggressive search to identify as many companies as I could, and added them to the directory. When I listed them, I emailed the site owners to ask for a link back. Some did, some didn't, but since the focus was to provide a service to users, I did not enforce the reciprocal link. Some of the links are from sites Google isn't aware of, some have a low PageRank (PR), and a few rank well. Some are well designed and some are really ugly. Many listings do not have Web sites at all. I did not take PR criteria into account when building my list. The focus was on creating a comprehensive resource for users. Ranking Highly While the intention of the directory was not to influence my search engine rankings, the site is now #1 on Google for its most important keyword phrases. How did that happen? I believe the site (and the directory page in particular) have been designated as a hub and an authority. An authority is a site with many pages linking to it, and a hub has many similarly themed outbound links. The tight theme of this page and the content that includes both text listings and links have made it spider-friendly as well as user-friendly. The Payoff There are many ways that this directory has helped my business: 1) Not only are local customers able to easily find our site, they are impressed that we offer a national-level service. 2) We don't waste time answering the phone or emails from people who want us to help them find a rental company. And we don't have to say, "No, we can't help you." 3) We have begun a moonwalk sales business as well, and companies who are pleased with the referrals we have been sending them are eager to buy their next equipment purchase from us. 4) We are building a reputation as an authority in the industry, and can bank on that in the future -- however we choose to use it. We have even been asked to sell franchises. 5) If we ever decide to implement paid listings, the current members already know that there is excellent value in being listed in our directory. 6) We are building awareness of the moonwalk industry by getting companies noticed who might never have been found on the Internet before. Content is King Is your site or industry appropriate for a directory of this type? Think about it from a user's standpoint and decide why they are visiting your site. The best way to determine how your site can be improved is to listen to the comments you receive through feedback forms, emails or phone calls. If you don't have a feedback form, you're missing an excellent free market research opportunity. The easiest way to improve your site, traffic, rankings, and business conversions is to simply give people what they are asking for. You don't need a high-priced consultant or an in-depth study. Go find some customers and start asking them what they want! Scottie Claiborne www.hullaballoorental.com ~~~Stuff You Might Like~~~ ++Recap of Past Stuff++ I've had a lot of requests for links to the various ebooks and reports that I've promoted over the past few months. So here's a quick rundown of them with links to my reviews: "Search Engine Optimization" Report by Mike Grehan </searchenginereport> - This is the one that's rocking the search engine world by providing solid facts on how search engines work. While the rest of us have been using trial and error to determine how to get high rankings, Mike's been interviewing the people that invented search engines! Read my full review here: </issue018.htm#stuff>. "Search Engine Optimization Fast Start" by Dan Thies - an SEO ebook for very busy people </issue013.htm#stuff> (and you can read my interview with the author at </issue014.htm#stuff>.) "21 Techniques to Maximize your Profits on Google AdWords Select" by Andrew Goodman - a special report that shows how to do exactly that </issue006.htm#seonews2>. "Step-By-Step(tm) Copywriting Course" by Karon Thackston - a full-blown copywriting course disguised as a .pdf file </issue009.htm#stuff>. "Selling Subscriptions to Internet Content" - This is the 253-page transcript from ContentBiz's "2nd Annual Selling Subscriptions to Internet Content Summit" which was held in May. If you have great free content that you want to start charging for, this report is a must-read. See my full review here: </issue017.htm#stuff>. Please note that those are my affiliate links and I get a percentage of any sales that may result from your purchases. It's a nice way for you to support the Advisor and also gain some extra SEO information! ~~~Advisor Wrap-Up~~~ That's all, folks! To my American subscribers, I hope you have a happy Thanksgiving! Next week I'll be in sunny Pompano, Florida with my family, visiting my 94-year-old grandmother. My sister Beth, who lives in Hawaii, will also be there, so it should be a fun time. My husband has plans to sign us all up for a swim with the dolphins at the Miami Seaquarium. I think I may sit it out and just videotape the rest of them. It's not cheap, and the money would be wasted on me. Not sure I even want to touch a dolphin, let alone swim with one! (Can you tell I'm not an animal person?) We'll see if we can get Beth to join in. At any rate, there will be no newsletter next week. See you in two! - Jill del.icio.us
|
|||