| Important Announcement: ***Need an Affordable SEO Website Review?*** |
![]() ![]() |
May 19 2004, 02:37 PM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() HR 4 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Active Members Posts: 215 Joined: 25-September 03 User's local time: Feb 9 2010, 11:15 AM From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada Member No.: 889 |
Hello,
I am investigating a 'querk' in the search engine listings for the domain name: highlands-inn.com. Here is what is going on: 1. highlands-inn.com redirects to highlandsinn.hyatt.com - I understand that this should be a 301 permanent redirect but this is not the issue. It also redirects again from the root url to /property/index.jhtml but this is not the issue either. 2. For some reason, when we search for 'west dearborn hotel', 'west dearborn' or 'hyatt regency dearborn' the domain 'highlands-inn.com' shows up instead of 'dearborn.hyatt.com' on MSN and Yahoo! We are not sure why! Hyatt Highlands is in California while Dearborn is in Michigan. Why would a California redirect page show up before the real Hyatt hotel in Michigan? (I'll post the redirect pages code below) Any ideas? (I find this very strange!) thanks, Craig Redirect #1 at http://www.highlands-inn.com CODE <html> <head> <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;charset=iso-8859-1"> <meta http-equiv="keywords" content="innhighlands-inncarmelhighlandcalifornialodging"> <meta name="description" content="Carmel Hotels: Hyatt Luxury Hotels and Resorts: Highlands Inn - A Park Hyatt Hotel, Carmel, USA"> <title>Welcome to Highlands Inn</title> <meta http-equiv="refresh" content="1;URL=http://www.highlandsinn.hyatt.com"> </head> <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> <div align="center"> </div> </body> </html> Redirect #2 at root at http://www.highlandsinn.hyatt.com CODE <!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN"><html><head><TITLE>Hyatt.com</TITLE><script language="Javascript"><!-- //
window.location.replace ('/property/index.jhtml'); //--> </script></head><body></body></html> |
|
|
|
May 19 2004, 02:58 PM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() HR 3 ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Active Members Posts: 86 Joined: 22-October 03 User's local time: Feb 9 2010, 11:15 AM Member No.: 1,152 |
I believe I heard something about this issue on Yahoo where they haven't implemented (bug?) the 301 properly, meaning they don't take the original out of the listings like they should. I'd imagine you'll just have to wait until they fix that or contact them and pester them to make it happen faster.
|
|
|
|
May 19 2004, 03:34 PM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() HR 7 Group: Moderator Posts: 2,241 Joined: 31-July 03 User's local time: Feb 9 2010, 08:15 AM From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada Member No.: 170 |
Yahoo admitted that was a bug they were working on at SES. I'd wait it out if possible.
Ian |
|
|
|
May 19 2004, 03:51 PM
Post
#4
|
|
![]() HR 4 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Active Members Posts: 215 Joined: 25-September 03 User's local time: Feb 9 2010, 11:15 AM From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada Member No.: 889 |
I do not think this has anything to do with a redirect. I just posted the code so that it could be excluded from the problem. Here is the issue:
When I search for Hyatt Regency Dearborn, here are the results: On Google - Correct On MSN - Incorrect On Yahoo - Incorrect The issue is when I am searching for that term, a hotel listing in California shows up before the correct Michigan hotel. Any ideas? |
|
|
|
May 19 2004, 04:11 PM
Post
#5
|
|
![]() Photographer ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Active Members Posts: 504 Joined: 22-September 03 User's local time: Feb 9 2010, 08:15 AM From: Beaverton, Oregon Member No.: 866 |
Guess: the California higlands Inn is a valid site, URL etc. The bot hits it, indexes everything, the redirect kicks in but the bot already left? (Not sure how bots handle delayed redirects).
Thus the search will find that site then their results pick it up since even with the re-direct it is more important than the link being redirected to? Less text but exact hits in name and primary data that it would use. If the meta-tag of NOINDEX, FOLLOW was in there then the bot would just not index this site at all, it would drop off the seach results but the real site would be indexed. |
|
|
|
May 20 2004, 09:41 AM
Post
#6
|
|
![]() HR 6 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Active Members Posts: 850 Joined: 4-May 04 User's local time: Feb 9 2010, 11:15 AM From: Atlanta, GA Member No.: 3,454 |
Wow, Craig. That is bizarre. My best guess was that Yahoo was still working with an old version of the page that did include "Dearborn" somewhere in it (however obscure), but their cached version at least is indeed just the raw JavaScript -- no "Dearborn" at all.
A legitimate SEO Guru title to the one who can figure this one out. |
|
|
|
May 20 2004, 11:45 AM
Post
#7
|
|
![]() HR 4 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Active Members Posts: 215 Joined: 25-September 03 User's local time: Feb 9 2010, 11:15 AM From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada Member No.: 889 |
Totally. I have no idea why this is happening. (IMG:http://www.highrankings.com/forum/style_emoticons/default/wacko.gif)
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 9th February 2010 - 10:15 AM |