| Important Announcement: ***Need an Affordable SEO Website Review?*** |
![]() ![]() |
Sep 1 2008, 10:54 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
HR 2 ![]() ![]() Group: Active Members Posts: 49 Joined: 14-September 06 User's local time: Feb 9 2010, 01:42 PM Member No.: 13,829 |
MS announces IE8 and moments later we have- Google Chrome.
It seems that IE is still not standards compliant (there are conflicting opinions so far), but seems to be running at +/- 50%, but Chrome is claiming 99% out of the gate... They say that testing has been intense, especially on pages with high PR The big schlameel is that each tab will run in a discreet process. Supposed to be out by Tues the 2nd at /chrome Cartoon book www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/ Google blog googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/09/fresh-take-on-browser.html This post has been edited by chrishirst: Sep 2 2008, 06:25 AM
Reason for edit: live links broken
|
|
|
|
Sep 2 2008, 06:47 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
HR 5 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Active Members Posts: 301 Joined: 15-December 05 User's local time: Feb 9 2010, 07:42 PM From: Bedford Uk Member No.: 9,794 |
MS announces IE8 and moments later we have- Google Chrome. It seems that IE is still not standards compliant (there are conflicting opinions so far), but seems to be running at +/- 50%, but Chrome is claiming 99% out of the gate... They say that testing has been intense, especially on pages with high PR The big schlameel is that each tab will run in a discreet process. Supposed to be out by Tues the 2nd at /chrome Cartoon book www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/ Google blog googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/09/fresh-take-on-browser.html mm i dont think high pr = standards compliant |
|
|
|
Sep 2 2008, 06:53 AM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() HR 9 Group: Moderator Posts: 4,356 Joined: 13-August 03 User's local time: Feb 9 2010, 06:42 PM From: Blackpool UK Member No.: 492 |
They are talking about the REAL PR which (in theory) are the most linked to pages, which again (in theory) are the pages most likely to be visited by a wide range of people.
So if those pages can be handled by their browser, it should cover most os the bases. |
|
|
|
Sep 2 2008, 07:35 AM
Post
#4
|
|
![]() HR 6 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Active Members Posts: 602 Joined: 13-August 04 User's local time: Feb 9 2010, 06:42 PM From: Suffolk UK Member No.: 4,668 |
Looks interesting.
So, whos going to be checking out the beta later today? I definitely will |
|
|
|
Sep 2 2008, 07:47 AM
Post
#5
|
|
![]() High Rankings Advisor Group: Admin Posts: 29,201 Joined: 21-July 03 User's local time: Feb 9 2010, 01:42 PM From: Ashland, MA Member No.: 2 |
I'm not too interested at the moment. Quite happy with Firefox.
|
|
|
|
Sep 2 2008, 10:04 AM
Post
#6
|
|
|
HR 6 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Active Members Posts: 798 Joined: 16-September 03 User's local time: Feb 9 2010, 06:42 PM From: Cornwall Member No.: 824 |
If it's Safari based, it could be a useful aid when designing on a PC for those that don't have a Mac.
|
|
|
|
Sep 2 2008, 10:22 AM
Post
#7
|
|
![]() Convert Me! Group: Admin Posts: 17,377 Joined: 17-August 03 User's local time: Feb 9 2010, 12:42 PM Member No.: 551 |
Just what I need to worry about, another new browser. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/shout.gif)
|
|
|
|
Sep 2 2008, 05:18 PM
Post
#8
|
|
|
HR 2 ![]() ![]() Group: Active Members Posts: 49 Joined: 14-September 06 User's local time: Feb 9 2010, 01:42 PM Member No.: 13,829 |
/chrome now live
Nice browser, simple, opens fast... but who needs it?? especially with FF now so well developed, w/ all the SEO plugins... The "seperate process per tab" thing is nice, but rarely does errant JS crash FF anyway Seems very much like FF as far as page presentation |
|
|
|
Sep 2 2008, 06:05 PM
Post
#9
|
|
|
HR 8 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Active Members Posts: 3,718 Joined: 5-April 05 User's local time: Feb 9 2010, 10:42 AM From: Seattle, WA Member No.: 7,091 |
Actually, I'm using it right now and it does some things MUCH better than Firefox.
I've never liked Firefox. I don't know if I'll like Chrome but it's not nearly as bad as Firefox. |
|
|
|
Sep 2 2008, 06:40 PM
Post
#10
|
|
![]() High Rankings Advisor Group: Admin Posts: 29,201 Joined: 21-July 03 User's local time: Feb 9 2010, 01:42 PM From: Ashland, MA Member No.: 2 |
I have so many FF extensions I use on a daily basis, I can't see switching to something else at this point, unless it somehow imports all the extensions with it.
|
|
|
|
Sep 2 2008, 06:47 PM
Post
#11
|
|
|
HR 2 ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 22 Joined: 2-November 07 User's local time: Feb 9 2010, 01:42 PM Member No.: 19,005 |
another browser to worry about wheter layouts are going to fit or not...
gosh, I didn't like it all!I don't think IE will lose popularity with that! |
|
|
|
Sep 2 2008, 07:34 PM
Post
#12
|
|
![]() High Rankings Advisor Group: Admin Posts: 29,201 Joined: 21-July 03 User's local time: Feb 9 2010, 01:42 PM From: Ashland, MA Member No.: 2 |
This is a really interesting read about Chrome (written like a comic book):
http://www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/index.html Definitely sucking me in to trying it....nooooooooooo
Reason for edit: fixed url
|
|
|
|
Sep 2 2008, 07:58 PM
Post
#13
|
|
![]() HR 5 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Active Members Posts: 333 Joined: 23-April 04 User's local time: Feb 9 2010, 01:42 PM From: Concord, California Member No.: 3,333 |
On Jill's link, leave out the /index.htm, or at least I had to. I've downloaded the beta version and am about to take it for a spin:-)
|
|
|
|
Sep 2 2008, 08:32 PM
Post
#14
|
|
![]() High Rankings Advisor Group: Admin Posts: 29,201 Joined: 21-July 03 User's local time: Feb 9 2010, 01:42 PM From: Ashland, MA Member No.: 2 |
Fixed...somehow l lost the "L" in html!
I still haven't downloaded, but I'm sooooo tempted...sure I will sometime this week. |
|
|
|
Sep 2 2008, 08:59 PM
Post
#15
|
|
![]() HR 5 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Active Members Posts: 333 Joined: 23-April 04 User's local time: Feb 9 2010, 01:42 PM From: Concord, California Member No.: 3,333 |
I took it for a little test run and that baby is fast!!!! I could get used to that as I'm a speed demon (IMG:style_emoticons/default/cool.gif) I opened up a second tab and was on the page where there's a youtube video on Chrome and that page crashed. At first I thought, oh well, I'll open it again tomorrow....but only the one tab crashed. It was great (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) I hadn't realized how annoying it was having IE crash for all my tabs if one tab crashed. I think the speed and the way only one tab crashed is definitely an improvement on IE. I might hold off using it exclusively until they're out of Beta but it looks good to me!
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 9th February 2010 - 01:42 PM |