| Important Announcement: ***Need an Affordable SEO Website Review?*** |
![]() ![]() |
Nov 8 2007, 10:10 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
HR 3 ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Active Members Posts: 72 Joined: 6-February 05 User's local time: Feb 9 2010, 04:01 PM Member No.: 6,533 |
A site im working on has had a 301 redirect from www.site.com to site.com
I follow the practice of redirecting site.com to www.site.com. The question is, if I recommend redirecting site.com to www.site.com after the site achieved a page rank of 5, will it LOSE the pagerank it has built up? |
|
|
|
Nov 8 2007, 10:48 PM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() High Rankings Advisor Group: Admin Posts: 29,201 Joined: 21-July 03 User's local time: Feb 9 2010, 03:01 PM From: Ashland, MA Member No.: 2 |
The redirected site will lose it's PageRank, yes. Because it basically won't exist anymore.
|
|
|
|
Nov 8 2007, 10:50 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
HR 3 ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Active Members Posts: 72 Joined: 6-February 05 User's local time: Feb 9 2010, 04:01 PM Member No.: 6,533 |
|
|
|
|
Nov 8 2007, 11:27 PM
Post
#4
|
|
![]() High Rankings Advisor Group: Admin Posts: 29,201 Joined: 21-July 03 User's local time: Feb 9 2010, 03:01 PM From: Ashland, MA Member No.: 2 |
Safer for what? You are redirecting the site, it doesn't need PageRank then, right?
|
|
|
|
Nov 8 2007, 11:49 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
HR 3 ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Active Members Posts: 72 Joined: 6-February 05 User's local time: Feb 9 2010, 04:01 PM Member No.: 6,533 |
Safer for what? You are redirecting the site, it doesn't need PageRank then, right? my fault - i wasn't very clear. currently there is a website that has a 301 from www.site.com to site.com the site.com has a pr 5 obviously, its a permanent 301 so www.site.com has no pagerank should i simply keep the site.com as is? |
|
|
|
Nov 9 2007, 12:09 AM
Post
#6
|
|
![]() High Rankings Advisor Group: Admin Posts: 29,201 Joined: 21-July 03 User's local time: Feb 9 2010, 03:01 PM From: Ashland, MA Member No.: 2 |
I guess I'm not clear why you're even asking.
Is it somehow causing you problems? |
|
|
|
Nov 9 2007, 12:48 AM
Post
#7
|
|
|
HR 3 ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Active Members Posts: 72 Joined: 6-February 05 User's local time: Feb 9 2010, 04:01 PM Member No.: 6,533 |
I guess I'm not clear why you're even asking. Is it somehow causing you problems? no... the last company I worked for told me it was white-hat best practices to 301 site.com to www.site.com This post has been edited by Randy: Nov 9 2007, 08:04 AM
Reason for edit: To remove inadvertant links.
|
|
|
|
Nov 9 2007, 08:07 AM
Post
#8
|
|
![]() Convert Me! Group: Admin Posts: 17,378 Joined: 17-August 03 User's local time: Feb 9 2010, 02:01 PM Member No.: 551 |
I'd leave it the way it is WYF.
It doesn't really matter if you make the www or non-www version of your site the "main" url address. The advice you got is basically correct, in that in the best possible scenario you want either one or the other to be your main addres. However since you've already had it as the non-www version for some time I'd leave it that way. If you were to switch it at this point it's going to take the search engines a few months to catch up, which could hurt your rankings for a time. |
|
|
|
Nov 14 2007, 09:56 PM
Post
#9
|
|
![]() Paz ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Active Members Posts: 702 Joined: 4-March 04 User's local time: Feb 9 2010, 04:01 PM From: Spain Member No.: 2,763 |
Im sure in the google accounts/tools somewhere there is a page that you can give your preferred domain. I believe it is for this canonoliccallaccall thingy
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 9th February 2010 - 03:01 PM |