 Article: Great Site Ranking In Google, Google file US patent |
| Important Announcement: *Written SEO Website Reviews Available* |
  |
 Jun 16 2005, 01:43 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
HR 2  Group: Active Members Posts: 48 Joined: 19-April 04 User's local time: Aug 1 2010, 10:03 AM From: Brisbane, QLD Member No.: 3,279  |
Don't if anyone has seen this yet, but this article examines Google's filing of a United States Patent Application on March 31, 2005.
|
 |
 
|
|
Jun 16 2005, 07:42 AM
Post
#2
|
|
 HR 6 Group: Active Members Posts: 850 Joined: 4-May 04 User's local time: Jul 31 2010, 08:03 PM From: Atlanta, GA Member No.: 3,454 |
Interesting. Does the patent application state that they are currently using all of this technology, or simply that they've developed it?
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 16 2005, 08:00 AM
Post
#3
|
|
 HR 4 Group: Banned Posts: 108 Joined: 13-June 05 User's local time: Jul 31 2010, 08:03 PM From: Connecticut Member No.: 7,737 |
QUOTE(Tyssen @ Jun 16 2005, 02:43 AM) Don't if anyone has seen this yet, but this article examines Google's filing of a United States Patent Application on March 31, 2005.  Very interesting. Thank you so much for the link! |
|
|
|
|
Jun 16 2005, 10:08 AM
Post
#4
|
|
 Convert Me!  Group: Admin Posts: 17,540 Joined: 17-August 03 User's local time: Jul 31 2010, 07:03 PM Member No.: 551 |
umm...
1. Technically the application doesn't mention Google at all. Though I recognize a lot of names in the application. 2. Technically the original document was filed at the December 31, 2003, not a couple of months ago, according to the patent application. Does anybody really think that Google isn't looking at Historical Data? If they weren't, why would they pay the fees to become a Registrar when they've stated that they're not going to offer domain registration services? Here's a link to the original document in case anybody wants to read it. |
|
|
|
|
Jun 16 2005, 11:10 AM
Post
#5
|
|
 HR 3 Group: Active Members Posts: 102 Joined: 21-May 05 User's local time: Jul 31 2010, 07:03 PM Member No.: 7,540 |
Anyone seen Google's new patent application: 20050071741
It talks about using historical data to determine a page's ranking (like user paths, and the such). I find it disturbing, makes me feel like my job is less secure. This post has been edited by steve_l: Jun 16 2005, 11:15 AM |
|
|
|
|
Jun 16 2005, 11:16 AM
Post
#6
|
|
|
HR 1 Group: Members Posts: 2 Joined: 4-March 05 User's local time: Jul 31 2010, 07:03 PM Member No.: 6,795 |
I just ran into this new article about google and its plans for SEO people and spamming. I was wonding if Jill might be able to take a look and let me know if its true or not.
buzzle.com/editorials/6-10-2005-71368.asp This post has been edited by searchrank: Jun 16 2005, 11:44 AM |
|
|
|
|
Jun 16 2005, 12:00 PM
Post
#7
|
|
 High Rankings Advisor Group: Admin Posts: 29,889 Joined: 21-July 03 User's local time: Jul 31 2010, 08:03 PM From: Ashland, MA Member No.: 2 |
2old2play and steve, I've merged your posts to this existing thread.
If I have time, I'm thinking of going through that article in next week's newsletter. So stay tuned! Jill |
|
|
|
|
Jun 16 2005, 01:56 PM
Post
#8
|
|
 HR 3 Group: Active Members Posts: 62 Joined: 7-August 03 User's local time: Jul 31 2010, 09:03 PM From: Arkansas Member No.: 418 |
If this article is true, it vindicates our methods of "organic" SEO. The third page wraps up with a lot of things that HighRankings.com has been saying for years.
Can anyone shed some light on the author? Is buzzle.com a reputable, long-standing site? Who are these guys? |
|
|
|
|
Jun 16 2005, 06:06 PM
Post
#9
|
|
 HR 3 Group: Active Members Posts: 61 Joined: 21-April 05 User's local time: Aug 1 2010, 01:03 AM Member No.: 7,226 |
Google isn't the only company filing patents which could affect the way in which the web works.
IBM filed 2,886 patents in 2000, I think that in total it was way over 22,000 patents. IBM earned 3415 US patents in 2003, ... anyway, you get the picture. Nobody ever seems concerned about the other companies. What they are doing could well shake some things up too. |
|
|
|
|
Jun 17 2005, 04:51 PM
Post
#10
|
|
|
HR 3 Group: Active Members Posts: 62 Joined: 7-August 03 User's local time: Jul 31 2010, 09:03 PM From: Arkansas Member No.: 418 |
Well the thing about a patent is you make it public so people can't legally copy your invention. With a search engine, you're not worried so much about people copying your invention as you are about people gaming your system.
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 25 2005, 01:40 AM
Post
#11
|
|
|
HR 1 Group: Members Posts: 2 Joined: 4-March 05 User's local time: Jul 31 2010, 07:03 PM Member No.: 6,795 |
any more word on this?
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 25 2005, 09:10 AM
Post
#12
|
|
|
High Rankings Advisor Group: Admin Posts: 29,889 Joined: 21-July 03 User's local time: Jul 31 2010, 08:03 PM From: Ashland, MA Member No.: 2 |
Well, I just wrote my own article on the Google's patent which you may be interested in.
|
|
|
|
 |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
This forum is sponsored by High Rankings, a Boston SEO Agency
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 31st July 2010 - 07:03 PM |