High Rankings Search Engine Optimization ForumHigh Rankings Advisor Search Marketing Newsletter

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Important Announcement: ***Need an Affordable SEO Website Review?***
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Different Serps On Different Pcs With Same Ip, Test shows Google gives different result
Alhazred_the_san...
post May 28 2005, 05:13 AM
Post #1


HR 1
*

Group: Members
Posts: 2
Joined: 27-May 05
User's local time:
Feb 9 2010, 10:57 AM
Member No.: 7,585



This is my first time posting on the forum, and perhaps this has been dealt with elsewhere.
A client asked me to his office two days ago to show me something he found unusual. I had optimised his site for 5 main key phrases, and he was doing his weekly review as advised. He ranked very well for all terms, 3 1st positions in MSN, plus a 3rd and 4th position. However, on Google something odd was happening: one computer showed his site on page 1 for all five terms, whereas the computer next to it showed his site anywhere from page three to five. Both searches were conducted simultaneously, and both computers share the same IP.

I returned home and conducted the same test on the three computers in my office, all sharing the same IP, and found no discrepancy. The SERPs were identical, and matched the best results from one of his computers. What was happening?

There was but one minor difference between the two machines in his office: The one showing the bad results just happens to be the machine he uses to manage his PPC and AdSense campaigns.

Any ideas?

btw My advice was that he should always use the other machine to check how he's doing in Google, since it showed the better results.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
OldWelshGuy
post May 28 2005, 08:04 AM
Post #2


Work is Fun
Group Icon

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4,642
Joined: 31-July 03
User's local time:
Feb 9 2010, 10:57 AM
From: Neath, South Wales, UK
Member No.: 110



This is more common than people realise unfortunately. It is all about Google datacenter load balancing (when you query Google you are not always checking the same datacentre). Odd though that it should be the one with the adwords cookie that shows the bad results... ooh big conspiracy again lol.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Alhazred_the_san...
post May 28 2005, 08:20 AM
Post #3


HR 1
*

Group: Members
Posts: 2
Joined: 27-May 05
User's local time:
Feb 9 2010, 10:57 AM
Member No.: 7,585



Cheers Baldy,
I'd heard that it might have something to do with different data centres, but for the life of me can't work out why that would be so when both PCs are running off the same IP, and the queries were made at exactly the same time. Especially as the results matched my own tests back here in the office.

And of course my suspicious mind was twitching because the less good results come on the computer with Google cookies, but the client says he deleted all cookies since then and the same thing continues to happen. But it's not much of a problem if every other searcher retrieves the same good results as I have gotten.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
OldWelshGuy
post May 28 2005, 09:04 AM
Post #4


Work is Fun
Group Icon

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4,642
Joined: 31-July 03
User's local time:
Feb 9 2010, 10:57 AM
From: Neath, South Wales, UK
Member No.: 110



We ran a test here late one night, and many of us all over saw the same reults, with a handful not seeing such good results. It is just the way things are 'hairy one' (IMG:http://www.highrankings.com/forum/style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
robwatts
post May 28 2005, 04:09 PM
Post #5


yackyack.co.uk
Group Icon

Group: Moderator
Posts: 306
Joined: 21-July 03
User's local time:
Feb 9 2010, 02:57 PM
From: London - Hertfordshire
Member No.: 6



QUOTE
btw My advice was that he should always use the other machine to check how he's doing in Google, since it showed the better results.


Great advice! (IMG:http://www.highrankings.com/forum/style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
OldWelshGuy
post May 28 2005, 04:12 PM
Post #6


Work is Fun
Group Icon

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4,642
Joined: 31-July 03
User's local time:
Feb 9 2010, 10:57 AM
From: Neath, South Wales, UK
Member No.: 110



I have BETTER advice, (although it is black hat advice( Shhhhhh come close and listen carefully) go to his office and accidentally (IMG:http://www.highrankings.com/forum/style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) (IMG:http://www.highrankings.com/forum/style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) spill some coffee over the machine giving the bad results (IMG:http://www.highrankings.com/forum/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

<OWG proves he is a black hat at heart lol>
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Scottie
post May 28 2005, 04:25 PM
Post #7


Psycho Mom
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 6,124
Joined: 21-July 03
User's local time:
Feb 9 2010, 10:57 AM
From: Columbia, SC
Member No.: 3



What we do know is the black hat is what rubbed all the hair off... (IMG:http://www.highrankings.com/forum/style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
OldWelshGuy
post May 28 2005, 04:30 PM
Post #8


Work is Fun
Group Icon

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4,642
Joined: 31-July 03
User's local time:
Feb 9 2010, 10:57 AM
From: Neath, South Wales, UK
Member No.: 110



QUOTE(Scottie @ May 28 2005, 05:25 PM)
What we do know is the black hat is what rubbed all the hair off...  (IMG:http://www.highrankings.com/forum/style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)
*


Scottie it was a classic 'matter V antimatter' situation my hair was going so it didn't matter. As for anti matter well an asociate in nursing (AN) told me that terrestrial Interference (TI) cause me to go bald! I thought it was a bic (IMG:http://www.highrankings.com/forum/style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
robwatts
post May 28 2005, 04:32 PM
Post #9


yackyack.co.uk
Group Icon

Group: Moderator
Posts: 306
Joined: 21-July 03
User's local time:
Feb 9 2010, 02:57 PM
From: London - Hertfordshire
Member No.: 6



Thats a bic much for us to take in there OWG, dya think we are that gullible. (IMG:http://www.highrankings.com/forum/style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) I think Scottie nailed it 1st time around. (IMG:http://www.highrankings.com/forum/style_emoticons/default/tongue.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Aptmt42
post Jun 2 2005, 01:29 AM
Post #10


HR 1
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1
Joined: 2-June 05
User's local time:
Feb 10 2010, 02:57 AM
Member No.: 7,629



QUOTE(OldWelshGuy @ May 29 2005, 09:12 AM)
I have BETTER advice, (although it is black hat advice( Shhhhhh come close and listen carefully) go to his office and accidentally (IMG:http://www.highrankings.com/forum/style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) (IMG:http://www.highrankings.com/forum/style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) spill some coffee over the machine giving the bad results (IMG:http://www.highrankings.com/forum/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

<OWG proves he is a black hat at heart lol>
*


OWG, I need both machines I'm getting different results on, so I'll pass on the advice for now. (IMG:http://www.highrankings.com/forum/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

After months and months of waiting for google to list me on the search term I wanted it to find me on, I got a result the other night at my home pc that put me in 11th place - an absolute surprise after no listing under the search term in the first 20+ pages! (other search terms put me 1st, 3rd etc)

When I check the same search at work, however, I get the old 'can't find you in the first 20 pages' result.

Thanks to this discussion I understand now that I might be hitting different data centres, but how is it possible they could be so vastly different? And what does it mean for the average search out there - will they get my home result or the work one?

I've been trying for months to improve the site and links etc to get a better ranking, but now I don't know whether to try and do something different to improve the ranking or wait until the datacentres are aligned? (Will they ever align and give the same result?)

I suppose I'd like to know: Is my new home result a promise of a better ranking or do I give up once and for all caring about google? <g> (MSN seems to be consistently showing a good ranking.)

I'm so confused. (IMG:http://www.highrankings.com/forum/style_emoticons/default/huh.gif)

kind regards to all

Mon

(IMG:http://www.highrankings.com/forum/style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
leadegroot
post Jun 2 2005, 02:23 AM
Post #11


Lea de Groot
*****

Group: Active Members
Posts: 488
Joined: 3-July 04
User's local time:
Feb 10 2010, 12:57 AM
From: Brisbane, Australia
Member No.: 4,229



Google is in the middle of an update *right now* - the official word (well, semi-official - from a google employee who posts on webmasterworld) is to wait a few days until it is finalised to check your rankings - its all in flux right now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Clintorius
post Jun 7 2005, 10:31 AM
Post #12


HR 4
****

Group: Active Members
Posts: 210
Joined: 31-July 03
User's local time:
Feb 9 2010, 10:57 AM
Member No.: 120



Your IP does not matter. It is the IP of the datacenter entry, that matters.

Think of load balancing this way:

1) You go to www.google.com and is handed the IP of datacenter 1
2) Five minutes later google chance the address of www.google.com to datacenter 2
3) You request google on PC number 2 and get the ip of datacenter 2
4) You request google again on pc number 1. You get the datacenter 1 again because that is the IP this browser knows. You refresh pc 2 and still get datacenter 2
5) A new five minutes period and Google.com change to datacenter 3
6) Test person OWG start up two computers within a short period. Both get the datacenter 3 ip.

Something like that will explain what you see.

Clintorius
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

  
Fast ReplyReply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



This forum is sponsored by High Rankings, a Boston SEO Agency
- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 9th February 2010 - 09:57 AM