High Rankings Search Engine Optimization ForumHigh Rankings Advisor Search Marketing Newsletter

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Important Announcement: ***Need an Affordable SEO Website Review?***
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Spidering Empty Cells ?
Dex
post May 26 2005, 11:12 AM
Post #1


HR 3
***

Group: Active Members
Posts: 97
Joined: 1-February 05
User's local time:
Feb 9 2010, 06:13 PM
Member No.: 6,467



I think I read somewhere, that it's more spider friendly to have   in empty cells in tables - is that right please?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
chrishirst
post May 26 2005, 11:45 AM
Post #2


HR 9
Group Icon

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4,356
Joined: 13-August 03
User's local time:
Feb 9 2010, 04:13 PM
From: Blackpool UK
Member No.: 492



Well I must say that's a new one.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
qwerty
post May 26 2005, 11:50 AM
Post #3


HR 10
Group Icon

Group: Moderator
Posts: 7,489
Joined: 24-July 03
User's local time:
Feb 9 2010, 11:13 AM
From: Somerville, MA
Member No.: 22



What Chris, in his subtle way, means (IMG:http://www.highrankings.com/forum/style_emoticons/default/tongue.gif) is that a search engine really doesn't care whether it sees a space or nothing at all. It's still nothing.

However, if you leave empty table cells empty (assuming you're using the table for layout purposes), rather than placing a non-breaking space in them, you may find that some browsers treat those cells in one way, and some browsers treat them differently. So be sure to test your layout across as many browsers you can get your hands on. Either that, or start using CSS for layout instead of tables (IMG:http://www.highrankings.com/forum/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jeffroyit
post May 26 2005, 12:07 PM
Post #4


HR 2
**

Group: Banned
Posts: 37
Joined: 25-January 05
User's local time:
Feb 9 2010, 12:13 PM
Member No.: 6,382



hmm, css instead of tables (IMG:http://www.highrankings.com/forum/style_emoticons/default/yuk.gif)

about empy cells: yes, it is better to use nbsp for rendering purposes. spiders still don't care about it
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dex
post May 26 2005, 12:12 PM
Post #5


HR 3
***

Group: Active Members
Posts: 97
Joined: 1-February 05
User's local time:
Feb 9 2010, 06:13 PM
Member No.: 6,467



Many thanks Qwerty and Chris, I didn't really explain that properly before ;-(

I thought I read somewhere, that if, for example, you had:

<table>
<tr>
<td> </td>
<th> </th>
<td>sample text - sample text - sample text</td>
<th></th>
<td> </td>
</tr>
</table>

Because the 1st cells are empty, the spider gets stuck, and can't get to the sample text, but in the following table, because the 1st cells are empty of any 'real text', *but*, not actually 'empty' the spider carries on going through the cells:

<table>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<th>&nbsp;</th>
<td>sample text - sample text - sample text</td>
<th>&nbsp;</th>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
</table>

Is that about right ?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
chrishirst
post May 26 2005, 12:16 PM
Post #6


HR 9
Group Icon

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4,356
Joined: 13-August 03
User's local time:
Feb 9 2010, 04:13 PM
From: Blackpool UK
Member No.: 492



no
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Raphael
post May 27 2005, 07:04 AM
Post #7


The Limey Cowboy
******

Group: Active Members
Posts: 722
Joined: 17-December 04
User's local time:
Feb 9 2010, 12:13 PM
From: New England
Member No.: 5,984



Spiders don't get "stuck" inside HTML. They may get caught in recursive link loops, but they don't get stuck inside HTML any more than any browser would get "stuck" inside HTML - And the spiders have an advantage over the browsers. They don't have to render the pages, so they don't even care whether your HTML is well formed or compliant or not. They just read the code, and store anything that's not an HTML tag.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dex
post May 27 2005, 08:26 AM
Post #8


HR 3
***

Group: Active Members
Posts: 97
Joined: 1-February 05
User's local time:
Feb 9 2010, 06:13 PM
Member No.: 6,467



Many thanks for the info - I obviously got the wrong details from somewhere.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



This forum is sponsored by High Rankings, a Boston SEO Agency
- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 9th February 2010 - 11:13 AM