Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Subscribe to HRA Now!

 



SEO Class in Chicago, IL

Learn How To Optimize Your Website on July 26, 2013


Looking for personalized in-depth SEO training among your peers?



High Rankings is offering a 1-day customized SEO training class in Chicago. Class size is limited so please sign-up now if you want in!



 


Are you a Google Analytics enthusiast?

Share and download Custom Google Analytics Reports, dashboards and advanced segments--for FREE! 

 



 

 www.CustomReportSharing.com 

From the folks who brought you High Rankings!



Photo

Centralized Rss Link Feed Dangerous?


  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

#1 gobayview

gobayview

    HR 1

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 3 posts
  • Location:Bay View, Milwaukee, WI

Posted 24 September 2004 - 10:10 PM

Hello All:

I run a little neighborhood site here in Milwaukee, and came up with a mysql/php/rss solution to have one central neighborhood link repository to which all neighborhood sites could refer (another part of it plots the links on a neighborhood map). I maintain the database at my central site, then serve it up as an RSS feed so other sites can keep an up-to-date neighborhood links page on their sites.

This really was done for this purpose only, but upon completion, I realized this linking system could be beneficial for strategical purposes. All the sites have something in common -- geography. So I tweaked the system a little to make sure linking sites put out actual server-side html and not client-side text as many rss aggregators do, and in recognition of identical content/mirror concerns, I made it so each sites links pages were slightly different (random selection and ordering).

My question: am I endangering the sites who use this linking sytem? Will Google drop them for participating in a spam program? I really did come up with it so 100 different sites would not have to all worry about their neighborhood links being out of date, and it really is useful for surfers, but realize I may be stepping into a gray area here.

Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.

Spice

#2 hoptoo

hoptoo

    HR 1

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 3 posts

Posted 28 September 2004 - 06:35 PM

I had been testing a similar thing to this and likely ran into the same trouble.
We used a small include footer that would randomly include links on other sites which we ran. In this way 30-40 sites consiting of large numbers of pages were all shoing 2-3 links at a time from a db of those sites. We tried to avoid flooding each page with links this way. The spiders have found them and found their way through to the other sites (referred by) but they appear to have "caught on" and not liked it. These sites have mostly not gotten deep crawled in 6 weeks. I attempting to keep all inbound links as static as possible now. I used the same change y db change all the sites strategy, and will no longer associate my sites in this way, as all the eggs may have been broken in that basket.

I only interlink my sites that sit on different IP servers completely. Not sure if thise was the other problem, but it wont be again.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users