Are you a Google Analytics enthusiast?
Share and download Custom Google Analytics Reports, dashboards and advanced segments--for FREE!

www.CustomReportSharing.com
From the folks who brought you High Rankings!
More SEO Content
Looksmart Going Bid Base
#1
Posted 13 September 2003 - 05:25 PM
#2
Posted 13 September 2003 - 05:48 PM
Where did you hear this? Is there a link you can point us to?
#3
Posted 13 September 2003 - 06:29 PM
Any idea how they'll avoid being sued by Overture?
Does this mean MSN is planning on dropping LookSmart? I doubt they'd want to show full pages of auction ranked search results. Or would they drop Overture to use a LookSmart PPC service? It sure seems like buying Findwhat would make more sense for MSN.
#4
Posted 13 September 2003 - 06:41 PM
#5
Posted 13 September 2003 - 06:59 PM
Without proof, it's just a rumor and should be treated as such.
Jill
#6
Posted 15 September 2003 - 01:58 AM
wow... I would have thought you would like the info... when it happens I guess my credibility will go up... nott very friendly around hereUnless we see some written proof from a LookSmart rep, I would take any information like this with a grain of salt.
Without proof, it's just a rumor and should be treated as such.
Jill
#7
Posted 15 September 2003 - 08:16 AM
It's not that you aren't credible- it's just that until it's official, anything can happen.
#8
Posted 15 September 2003 - 09:50 AM
In all seriousness, I think they will go bid based. An auction system will make them more attractive for acquisition by Micro$oft. Plus they already announced that new thing where you pay a fixed cost per click depending on the industry you are in. That sounds like minimum cost (aka adwords) all over again.
#9
Posted 15 September 2003 - 11:44 AM
I'm not at all saying it's not true, or that it won't happen, or that you're making it up. But at this time, it's just something you heard from someone, right?
It's fine to post that sort of information, along with the source so that we all understand what we're talking about.
Jill
#10
Posted 15 September 2003 - 06:14 PM
This is something I was told by two people at LookSmart. If I mention their names they would get into trouble for leaking the information before LookSmart was ready to publish the facts. But it is something that will be announced in the next couple of weeks.The info is interesting, Aussie. But without it saying this anywhere on the LookSmart site, it's still hearsay and I just wanted to point that out before it is suddenly all over the Web as being true.
I'm not at all saying it's not true, or that it won't happen, or that you're making it up. But at this time, it's just something you heard from someone, right?
It's fine to post that sort of information, along with the source so that we all understand what we're talking about.
Jill
#11
Posted 15 September 2003 - 07:05 PM
LOL. It's not considered a leak if you don't reveal your source?If I mention their names they would get into trouble for leaking the information before LookSmart was ready to publish the facts. But it is something that will be announced in the next couple of weeks.
BTW, tough night for LookSmart on the Nasdaq. There's nothing exciting in that 10-Q/A.
#12
Posted 16 September 2003 - 10:25 AM
It was and is a leak... these people are being trained for this new method right now at LookSmart, so if anyone has any other people they know there talk to them and ask them how the new training is going, how tough it is etc. and maybe you get them to say something.LOL. It's not considered a leak if you don't reveal your source?
BTW, tough night for LookSmart on the Nasdaq. There's nothing exciting in that 10-Q/A.
Mention who would be another and not one I want to do.
#13
Posted 16 September 2003 - 10:29 AM
#14
Posted 17 September 2003 - 07:57 PM
#15
Posted 25 September 2003 - 02:14 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users








