Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Subscribe to HRA Now!

 



Are you a Google Analytics enthusiast?

Share and download Custom Google Analytics Reports, dashboards and advanced segments--for FREE! 

 



 

 www.CustomReportSharing.com 

From the folks who brought you High Rankings!


Sponsored Content

 

 
 

Photo
- - - - -

Popularity


  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

#1 TheGreatDane

TheGreatDane

    HR 4

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 150 posts
  • Location:Vejle, Denmark

Posted 07 September 2003 - 05:59 AM

When talking about the popularity of a site and the importance of this in relation to the ranking you can achieve on SE's, is this then only a question of link popularity (backlinks)?

Or does the number of visits to a site play its own part in the judgement of popularity? I would find it logic to be so, but I don't understand how this could be measured by the search engines, without them having access to the log files for the site in question?

#2 bwelford

bwelford

    HR 5

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 484 posts
  • Location:Langley, British Columbia, Canada

Posted 07 September 2003 - 06:16 AM

I believe you're right in your assumption. If there was no web traffic whatsoever, the search results from all search engines would look exactly the same.

Barry Welford

#3 air-dog

air-dog

    HR 3

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 105 posts
  • Location:Hull, UK

Posted 07 September 2003 - 06:38 AM

This could be a good idea, like you say though, google would need access to the logs.

The only thing is though, what makes something popular is not how many times its visited.... but how many times its re-visited.

#4 Jill

Jill

    High Rankings Advisor

  • Admin
  • 32,311 posts

Posted 07 September 2003 - 10:03 AM

Some engines do have click-tracking installed and do use popularity of a site when deteriming rankings.

DirectHit was the company that popularized this and it used to be installed on HotBot and MSN (Inkomi bought it).

These days, it doesn't seem to be as prevalent, and Google doesn't appear to use tracking URLs, except on small subsets of users. They may or may not use that subset of info for checking site popularity.

Jill

#5 amabaie

amabaie

    HR 6

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 606 posts
  • Location:Ontario, Canada

Posted 07 September 2003 - 04:08 PM

At first blush, it would make sense for a SE to rank higher the sites with the most visits.

But, wait ... isn't that a bit incestuous? The sites that get the most visits are the sites that rank highest on the SE. No new sites would stand a chance of ever breaking out of the "slums". It would defeat the whole concept of trying to provide the most relevant results.

In university, I remember a professor of "municipal politics" who was horrible. :learn: His senility was not even in question, and in every single class he spent at least five minutes talking about his favorite strip club. But the university had to let him teach some class because he had "tenure". May the SEs never resort to such torture upon their "classes". :)

#6 Debra

Debra

    HR 7

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,029 posts
  • Location:Williamsburg, Virginia

Posted 08 September 2003 - 09:28 AM

LOL... search engine and strip clubs.....


Or does the number of visits to a site play its own part in the judgement of popularity


Sites can be popular, receive tons of traffic and not rank in the top 20.
For example, The Onion http://www.theonion....t_homepage.html is a very popular news line and yet, when you search for "news", or "community news" it's not in the top 20 on Google.

So no, I don't think so in an algorithmic sense. But obviously yes in the general humanistic approach to popularity.

what makes something popular is not how many times its visited.... but how many times its re-visited


Good point air-dog. And definitely what link popularity is all about! If you like a site well enough to link to it, you're voting to send traffic repeatedly.

#7 bwelford

bwelford

    HR 5

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 484 posts
  • Location:Langley, British Columbia, Canada

Posted 08 September 2003 - 09:34 AM

magnolia,

Since The Onion comes up as #1 in Google if you search on "the" with The White HOUSE as #2, what more do they need!

Barry Welford

#8 Debra

Debra

    HR 7

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,029 posts
  • Location:Williamsburg, Virginia

Posted 08 September 2003 - 11:41 AM

I was speaking from a popularity standpoint Barry.

The Onion is wildly popular, but it's name/reputation/popularity alone isn't enough to make it rank for the terms I suggested.

It's a specific search. Hence I don't think popularity, whether it's click or humanistic is a criteria for rank!

I love The Onion, don't you? It's a great read.

#9 TheGreatDane

TheGreatDane

    HR 4

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 150 posts
  • Location:Vejle, Denmark

Posted 08 September 2003 - 03:34 PM

Sites can be popular, receive tons of traffic and not rank in the top 20. 
For example, The Onion http://www.theonion....t_homepage.html  is a very popular news line and yet, when you search for "news", or "community news" it's not in the top 20 on Google.

Interesting information, Magnolia! :embarrassed:

I also DO hope, that the rankings aren't that much influenced by the number of visits, as this IMO would lead to a somewhat unfair situation. In fact in could mean, that if the budget was large enough one could e.g. by means of a TV campaign "boost" the popularity even though the site were not optimized in any way. And thus the sites with the best rankings would be the sites supported by the largest budgets!

#10 Debra

Debra

    HR 7

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,029 posts
  • Location:Williamsburg, Virginia

Posted 08 September 2003 - 07:00 PM

I also DO hope, that the rankings aren't that much influenced by the number of visits


I doubt that the number of visits factors in much on any of the search engines Dane.

Good question for the next time I see a Google rep!

Speaking of Google reps and questions, I got an answer on one of the questions I asked while in San Jose. I'll begin a new thread!


OM gosh, I just noticed the spell check. Way to go Scottie!

#11 TheGreatDane

TheGreatDane

    HR 4

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 150 posts
  • Location:Vejle, Denmark

Posted 09 September 2003 - 02:07 AM

Good question for the next time I see a Google rep!


That would be nice :drunk: ...even though I don't know how open they are as to reveal their "secrets"?

#12 Debra

Debra

    HR 7

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,029 posts
  • Location:Williamsburg, Virginia

Posted 09 September 2003 - 08:28 AM

Hey, nothing ventured, nothing gained. Sometimes it's not what you ask but how! :D

I still maintain it's not a big deal. Focus on content and developing your link partners and you'll get there!

#13 TheGreatDane

TheGreatDane

    HR 4

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 150 posts
  • Location:Vejle, Denmark

Posted 09 September 2003 - 11:03 AM

Hey, nothing ventured, nothing gained. Sometimes it's not what you ask but how! 

Yeah - I have often realized (usually too late), that women have some "build in" talent for asking in the right way :dance:

I'm sure you will be able to get the right answer, and thanks for your input!
:band:




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users