Are you a Google Analytics enthusiast?
More SEO Content
The Worst Article In History
Posted 16 April 2004 - 06:12 PM
Everything in this article is pretty much wrong.
What is wrong with WebProNews that they would publish this garbage?
Posted 16 April 2004 - 06:23 PM
80% of the top 10 results have keyword rich domains so this proves it works. that is so lame, it is like looking at a pond and saying, the pond is flat> the pond is water> water is flat
At least there is hope for me and my article 'cabbage on the monitor boosts Google positions.
It is true, & I can prove it.
I have a cabbage plant that I take into the office, and place it on top of my monitor while I work, while there I optimise, this boosts client positions, so by using the logic in the article
cabbage plant on monitor> site optimised> better rankings or cabbage on monitor> better rankings.
Time for my bed I think, It has been a tough week, and tomorrow we go look at the money pit and see what work they have not done on it.
Posted 16 April 2004 - 11:50 PM
I talked with Greg Jarboe at the NY SES and he said that he used to be an editor...the name of the award should be
Back Page SEO News
or something like that...
Posted 17 April 2004 - 12:02 AM
What about THIS article? No comments? This is the type of article that pains the whole industry.
Anyone can post anything anywhere, even if they know nothing. And places like that pick it up and run it. Doesn't matter if you just learned SEO yesterday, or 3 months ago or whatever.
Everything said in that article is wrong. Not just one thing. Everything. Even says not to use .php and .asp! Only .html!
Posted 17 April 2004 - 12:11 AM
But there is good news in there: the domain name they recommend as being perfect for search engines, www.search-engine-optimization-ranking-placement-services.com, appears to be available
Posted 17 April 2004 - 12:19 AM
Posted 17 April 2004 - 12:32 AM
I think I'll do an article about how Yahoo is going to beat Google because they've got technology stolen from a colony of Venusians hiding out in the Bermuda Triangle.
Posted 17 April 2004 - 02:16 AM
The .php etc. thing I encounter a lot. Not just outdated articles but recent stuff. I guess it is like other pro's: a doctor stops reading up some day as well...
Posted 17 April 2004 - 03:45 AM
Also, try keeping your optimized pages in html/htm format and NOT .php. .asp or other formats. Because, search engine spiders find it easier to index a static page (in html/htm format) than a dynamic page (in .php or .asp format).
This is the exact that I have customers coming to me saying; hold out on SEO as they are changing their site to static instead of dynamic. Even though I have no idea how they would manage particular sites in static. What a nightmare.
What a who wrote it and another one who released it.
Posted 17 April 2004 - 10:08 AM
I was looking for a place on their forum to discuss it. I may have to go in there and start a thread. I am truly sickened by it. It's just worse than bad. It's completely false, misleading, stupid, dumb, wrong, and the worst article I've ever read regarding SEO.
Posted 17 April 2004 - 10:17 AM
Posted 17 April 2004 - 11:32 AM
Hate to have to write a new article, but I feel it's important. The thought of so many people reading that article and believing it is just sickening.
Posted 17 April 2004 - 12:34 PM
Posted 17 April 2004 - 12:37 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users