Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Subscribe to HRA Now!

 



SEO Class in Chicago, IL

Learn How To Optimize Your Website on July 26, 2013


Looking for personalized in-depth SEO training among your peers?



High Rankings is offering a 1-day customized SEO training class in Chicago. Class size is limited so please sign-up now if you want in!



 


Are you a Google Analytics enthusiast?

Share and download Custom Google Analytics Reports, dashboards and advanced segments--for FREE! 

 



 

 www.CustomReportSharing.com 

From the folks who brought you High Rankings!



Photo
- - - - -

Predicting Next Page Rank


  • Please log in to reply
44 replies to this topic

#31 rohgan03

rohgan03

    HR 6

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 944 posts

Posted 09 April 2004 - 02:08 PM

I am being cryptic on purpose, sorry if this doesn't read well.


:D

#32 Jill

Jill

    High Rankings Advisor

  • Admin
  • 32,379 posts

Posted 09 April 2004 - 04:00 PM

Okay, so OOP apparently means "over optimization penalty" according to the links you posted.

Which means this...

I dont mean off page OOP, I mean off page over optimized. but not in a bad way.


...makes even less sense to me.

What in the world are you talking about? Or maybe we should just forget it, since I still stand by the fact that you don't seem to be quite sure any more either!

Jill

#33 rustybrick

rustybrick

    Seeking A+ Posts

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 151 posts
  • Location:New York

Posted 09 April 2004 - 05:45 PM

See, you keep thinking penalty. I am not saying that.

I am saying that overly optimized off page means pages that put more emphasis then most sites do towards the off page elements. maybe "overly" is a bad word.

Also no need to use words like "fact" in this thread, Jill.

#34 qwerty

qwerty

    HR 10

  • Moderator
  • 8,323 posts
  • Location:Somerville, MA

Posted 09 April 2004 - 05:48 PM

So are you talking about putting the wrong emphasis on off-page factors, like getting a billion links from sites that have nothing to do with yours?

#35 Jill

Jill

    High Rankings Advisor

  • Admin
  • 32,379 posts

Posted 09 April 2004 - 05:49 PM

Huh? I keep thinking penalty? What are you talking about?

The links you pointed to said that OOP was "over optimization penalty." It's not what I'm thinking, it's what you mentioned!

I'm sorry, but I just have no idea what we're even talking about any more. I believe the plot (if there ever was one) is lost.

#36 rustybrick

rustybrick

    Seeking A+ Posts

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 151 posts
  • Location:New York

Posted 09 April 2004 - 06:01 PM

No Jill, Someone asked what is OOP so we went off on a tangent on that topic. Why argue?

Lets just close this thread, if you want.

#37 BrianR

BrianR

    Is it just me, or is it getting cooler in the evenings...?

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,621 posts
  • Location:Chester, UK

Posted 09 April 2004 - 07:20 PM

Yes - I'll vote for that - the thread is going nowhere fast.

BrianR

#38 awall19

awall19

    Peanut Butter Lover

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 502 posts

Posted 09 April 2004 - 08:41 PM

I think he was stating that a page which has purchased a large # of links will throw off his prediction tool. The same type of error occurs with that tool when a new site or a site of low popularity gets syndicated by huge sites such as internet news, etc.

#39 Jill

Jill

    High Rankings Advisor

  • Admin
  • 32,379 posts

Posted 09 April 2004 - 10:37 PM

Aaron, thanks for the clarification. Now THAT I understand!

And Rusty Brick, I don't know why you think I'm arguing with you. I was just trying to understand what you were saying, but each post seemed more cryptic than the next.

#40 awall19

awall19

    Peanut Butter Lover

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 502 posts

Posted 10 April 2004 - 01:47 AM

no prob Jill

I clearly saw what both of you were thinking and how you absolutely were not cross over to one another. I think each divergent post was confusing the other even more...

#41 BrianR

BrianR

    Is it just me, or is it getting cooler in the evenings...?

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,621 posts
  • Location:Chester, UK

Posted 12 April 2004 - 04:41 PM

Nice rescue job, Aaron!

BrianR

#42 rustybrick

rustybrick

    Seeking A+ Posts

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 151 posts
  • Location:New York

Posted 14 April 2004 - 11:04 AM

Ok - found a good document that might provide more insight into Over Optimizing Off Page elements.

http://dbpubs.stanfo...df&compression=

See section 3.2

[Added - The link is a PDF document for those who don't like those. ~ Randy]

Edited by Randy, 14 April 2004 - 01:07 PM.


#43 blackpool

blackpool

    blackpool

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 190 posts
  • Location:Blackpool England UK

Posted 14 April 2004 - 02:11 PM

For what it's worth..........
My PR is now 6 after the next update the tool says it will be 8!!!!!!!!!
So what????

I'd rather have more visitors and backlinks.... thank you very much :)

#44 rustybrick

rustybrick

    Seeking A+ Posts

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 151 posts
  • Location:New York

Posted 14 April 2004 - 02:20 PM

what about higher conversion rates?

Ill build a tool that predicts your future conversion rates soon. :)

#45 Jill

Jill

    High Rankings Advisor

  • Admin
  • 32,379 posts

Posted 14 April 2004 - 02:32 PM

My PR is now 6 after the next update the tool says it will be 8!!!!!!!!!


I wouldn't count on it, blackpool.

Jill




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users