I have two questions really:
1. Are this articles points valid? To some degree they are, but then the other side of the debate is not addresses, and the Author offers absolutely NO evidence whatsoever!!
2. Is this article a thinly vailed comment about Jill?? Seems that way to me, and a bit nasty and all!!!
Personally, the complete and utter lack of proof WHATSOEVER strikes me as pretty hypocritcal. Point to specifics, and give real examples. This "I know a guy, lets call him Mr Snrub.." kinda cloak and dagger reporting is a little poor IMHO.
Apart from that, I kinda like the Forum wrap up at the bottom, though. Irrespective of what you think of his ideas, knowing where he comes from allows one to judge his opinions acordingly.
What are other people's thoughts?
Edited by Jill, 24 August 2003 - 11:43 PM.