Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Subscribe to HRA Now!

 



Are you a Google Analytics enthusiast?

Share and download Custom Google Analytics Reports, dashboards and advanced segments--for FREE! 

 



 

 www.CustomReportSharing.com 

From the folks who brought you High Rankings!



Photo
- - - - -

How To Get Google Organic Sitelinks?


  • Please log in to reply
18 replies to this topic

#1 karthick

karthick

    HR 2

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 28 posts

Posted 17 November 2014 - 02:50 AM

Hi, Please give me any tips how to get Organic site links for the website.



#2 chrishirst

chrishirst

    A not so moderate moderator.

  • Moderator
  • 7,718 posts
  • Location:Blackpool UK

Posted 17 November 2014 - 12:04 PM

Have content worth linking to.



#3 jenot

jenot

    HR 1

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 3 posts
  • Location:Poland/Holland

Posted 19 November 2014 - 02:51 PM

It's not so easy. Some people must visit your website and someone must see there something very interesting/funny/shocking.

Only "great" websites have natural backlinks from other people, who didn't be asked for this...



#4 chrishirst

chrishirst

    A not so moderate moderator.

  • Moderator
  • 7,718 posts
  • Location:Blackpool UK

Posted 19 November 2014 - 05:36 PM

"shocking" is only short lived in terms of visitor interest.



#5 torka

torka

    Vintage Babe

  • Moderator
  • 4,825 posts
  • Location:Triangle area, NC, USA, Earth (usually)

Posted 20 November 2014 - 03:22 PM

As Chris says, you have to have content worth linking to. This could be your products or services, articles, informational resources, whatever. The thing is, whatever it is, the text needs to be well written, the site needs to be well organized and easy to use, and it doesn't hurt if it all looks good, too.

 

If you don't have something worth linking to, you're doomed from the start.

 

Then you have to use marketing to get the word out about your site. You may have the greatest, most entertaining, most informative, most engaging website in the world, but if you do nothing to let the outside world know about it, it's not going to do all that well. There are billions of websites out there -- you can't expect people to just stumble over yours by chance.

 

By marketing, I am not talking about the kind of stuff that you can crank out with little to no effort in a matter of minutes a day. I'm not referring to "cheap and easy" tactics (forum and blog comment spam, low-quality "guest posts", directory submissions, etc.).

 

What I do mean is real old-school "hard work" marketing, which might include such things as paid advertising, personal outreach, content marketing, email/direct mail campaigns, etc. When people see what your site has to offer, some of them will want to share with their followers/visitors. And you'll get solid, editorial organic links. It's not going to be quick and it's not going to be easy. That's why it will have at least a chance of working.

 

--Torka :oldfogey:


Edited by torka, 20 November 2014 - 03:25 PM.


#6 jenot

jenot

    HR 1

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 3 posts
  • Location:Poland/Holland

Posted 20 November 2014 - 03:46 PM

Yes of course, but not only this. If you are fanatic or big liar or have crazy kind of humour ;) then people can make you links with anchor "Idiot" "fanatic" "crazy" "stupid" :)

If not this way, you have to make really good job on your website to have recognition..



#7 Michael Martinez

Michael Martinez

    HR 10

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,325 posts
  • Location:Georgia

Posted 20 November 2014 - 04:00 PM

You need enough content for Google to distinguish some pages as better for its users than others. Using a tiered, hierarchical navigation structure works better than a flat site architecture.

#8 KDBwebsolutions

KDBwebsolutions

    HR 1

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 8 posts

Posted 20 November 2014 - 04:04 PM

"shocking" is only short lived in terms of visitor interest.

Short lived for users indentified as visiting more than once is what Chris is saying. Your shock factor is meant to impress new visitors enough to either increase their duration time on the landing page OR prompt the user to share the content on the page. Captivating content such as Images or informative dialogue is great for this.



#9 KDBwebsolutions

KDBwebsolutions

    HR 1

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 8 posts

Posted 20 November 2014 - 04:12 PM

You need enough content for Google to distinguish some pages as better for its users than others. Using a tiered, hierarchical navigation structure works better than a flat site architecture.

In your opinion, would Schema Mark up help when used in conjunction with the hierarchical structure?



#10 chrishirst

chrishirst

    A not so moderate moderator.

  • Moderator
  • 7,718 posts
  • Location:Blackpool UK

Posted 20 November 2014 - 05:46 PM

It is the linking structure that counts NOT the physical one.



#11 chrishirst

chrishirst

    A not so moderate moderator.

  • Moderator
  • 7,718 posts
  • Location:Blackpool UK

Posted 20 November 2014 - 05:55 PM

Yes of course, but not only this. If you are fanatic or big liar or have crazy kind of humour ;) then people can make you links with anchor "Idiot" "fanatic" "crazy" "stupid" :)

If not this way, you have to make really good job on your website to have recognition..

 

On the other hand, they may just ignore the site as a pointless waste of time.


  • KDBwebsolutions likes this

#12 Jill

Jill

    Recovering SEO

  • Admin
  • 33,244 posts

Posted 20 November 2014 - 05:59 PM

I'm not sure that all the posters in this topic noticed that the OP was talking about getting "Sitelinks" not getting links pointing to the site. 

 

Two completely different things, IMO. I'm sure we have a number of threads about Sitelinks.



#13 KDBwebsolutions

KDBwebsolutions

    HR 1

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 8 posts

Posted 20 November 2014 - 07:05 PM

It is the linking structure that counts NOT the physical structure.

So the Sitelink doesn't need to contain relevant keywords to the page your linking to? Thus meaning that meta tags and rich snippets on the page the hypertext points at aren't important?

I'd have to disagree, Linking structure ( or SILOs ), and landing page structure go hand in hand for generating site links.


Edited by KDBwebsolutions, 20 November 2014 - 07:06 PM.


#14 chrishirst

chrishirst

    A not so moderate moderator.

  • Moderator
  • 7,718 posts
  • Location:Blackpool UK

Posted 21 November 2014 - 06:00 AM

Nope!

 

NOTHING that you can do will get your 'site'  'Sitelinks' in Google results.



#15 Michael Martinez

Michael Martinez

    HR 10

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,325 posts
  • Location:Georgia

Posted 21 November 2014 - 09:38 AM

Just give the search engine something to work with as described above and then let it do its thing. But if you don't see the sitelinks it won't be the end of the world.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

We are now a read-only forum.
 
No new posts or registrations allowed.