holly molly.. haha.. I am sitting here with a big smiley face and yeah.. I take your input very very good... I am usually a very funny guy and you know... rankings, seo, and lot's of other stuff in live... I am just digging to learn a bit more... so nooo worries at all, I take your comments really with humor. Plus I am getting lot's of "understanding" out of it - so please no worries. In general I wanted to say something: I realized in some other forums that people start to fight about things... and I always think... wow.. really ? Why ?
You know.. it's like with ice cream.. some prefer vanilla, some chocolate... but if someone prefers vanilla.. I will not blame him and ask him ? What ? just vanilla ? That means, if you don't like chocolate, you are my enemy, because you don't like chocolate... haha
holly cow.. I've seen these ridiculous arguments all the time.. not just on forums, also in real life.. and you now what... I think people take it to serious... from my perspective.. you can have different preferences, for some it works better, for some not.
but so be it.
And yes.. regarding the spiders... actually I am not trying to manipulate anything... my goal is to understand a bit more the technical background.. that's all.
And combined with some over the top articles from moz, and just pulling portions out of the cake... it's getting pretty easy .. yeah.. I would say overwhelming ...
soo.. yeah.. even if I don't know you.. I pictured your nice avatar face .. how you sit in front of your desktop and typing your comments... thinking about: this guy is just nuts, what does he not get ? hahah....
no worries, I appreciate having these conversations.. and I am really stoked about it having people spread out all over the world but having the same interests !!!
yes.. thx.. see .. I guess this is what I meant.. the crawling happens anyways.. and my conclusion regarding the moz article... yeah, it makes somehow sense what they wanted to point out.. but quite frankly, after digging into that topic a bit more I realize it's just over the top.. what I mean is.. they are pointing out a possible issue, that 99% of the time doesn't really exist.. I mean, the crawling issue they showed... spiders and crawling is sooo good these days.. you also have the sitemap etc.. I would say, in my experience, all my pages have been always indexed, except the ones I excluded from the robots.txt file.
So to close the spider and crawling chapter... this is what learned.
Soo.. this still might be worth a second look.. like I pointed out in my video.. there are many people out there claiming you can control and optimize your internal link-juice.
Somehow it makes sense... however, till today.. I was never able to see a practical example .. someone who laid out a super simple graph with two pages and a few posts to demonstrate his idea and vision about a good functional internal link structure.
I am more a visual guy.. so I thought.. if I can just illustrate one example (which can not be taken as a blueprint, because that one and only perfect solution simple doesn't exist) but .. can taken as ONE EXAMPLE that poeple agree on and say:
you know what.. we all agree on it, this would be a good internal link structure.. that might work very well for users, and you will not run into technical issues .... Boom..
that's actually it.. so that was my whole idea behind, my whole intention.... to get one example laid out how the anchor links are connected... you know...
and I still love the idea to work out one simple graph.. or one simple illustration.. you name it, you pick the topic.. doesn't matter if the root domain is about cherries or cookies... lol;
sooo that being said, I hope this all makes sense now from my perspective.
However.. I really appreciate having you all around here....
well then.. happy "highrankings" to everyone,
let's keep rocking ...
Edited by reseo, 02 June 2014 - 12:20 PM.