Are you a Google Analytics enthusiast?
Share and download Custom Google Analytics Reports, dashboards and advanced segments--for FREE!

www.CustomReportSharing.com
From the folks who brought you High Rankings!
More SEO Content
International SEM | Social Media | Search Friendly Design | SEO | Paid Search / PPC | Seminars | Forum Threads | Q&A | Copywriting | Keyword Research | Web Analytics / Conversions | Blogging | Dynamic Sites | Linking | SEO Services | Site Architecture | Search Engine Spam | Wrap-ups | Business Issues | HRA Questions | Online Courses
Canonical Urls Just For Google
Started by
rickny
, Apr 09 2012 01:10 PM
5 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 09 April 2012 - 01:10 PM
Developing a new site where URLs are intentionally kept as short as possible (e.g. site.com/123). Would there be a downside to telling Google that the canonical URL for each page is site.com/123-page-specific-keyword even though the shorter number-only URLs are used everywhere?
#2
Posted 09 April 2012 - 03:01 PM
Yes, that would be really silly and unhelpful. Choose one way or the other.
#3
Posted 19 April 2012 - 08:47 AM
As I understood it and use them, canonical is so any pages that have a mutitude of potential query string parameters and so seens a separate urls are seen as just one to Google -> the canonical name.
That is correct isn't it Jill?
That is correct isn't it Jill?
Edited by 1dmf, 19 April 2012 - 08:47 AM.
#4
Posted 19 April 2012 - 09:40 AM
That's the main usage, yes, 1dmf.
#5
Posted 19 April 2012 - 10:08 AM
wow - i'm doing something right for once
#6
Posted 19 April 2012 - 11:27 AM
wow - i'm doing something right for once
Man! It had to happen some point, according to the law of averages
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users







