Am I missing something here with the whole Google penalised situation? Have they been penalised for putting a link on a 3rd party website?
Am I missing the whole point? Can anyone clarify?
Subscribe to HRA Now!
Are you a Google Analytics enthusiast?
Share and download Custom Google Analytics Reports, dashboards and advanced segments--for FREE!
www.CustomReportSharing.com
From the folks who brought you High Rankings!
More SEO Content
International SEM | Social Media | Search Friendly Design | SEO | Paid Search / PPC | Seminars | Forum Threads | Q&A | Copywriting | Keyword Research | Web Analytics / Conversions | Blogging | Dynamic Sites | Linking | SEO Services | Site Architecture | Search Engine Spam | Wrap-ups | Business Issues | HRA Questions | Online Courses
Sponsored Content
Google Penalised
Started by
swirly
, Jan 04 2012 09:00 AM
5 replies to this topic
#2
Mikl
-
- Active Members
-
- 231 posts
HR 4
- Location:Edinburgh, Scotland
Posted 04 January 2012 - 09:04 AM
I think I'm missing something here. What do you mean by "have they been penalised"? Have who been penalised? And what is a "3rd party website"?
#3
swirly
-
- Members
-
- 4 posts
HR 1
Posted 04 January 2012 - 09:19 AM
Google got Penalised for running a Video Campaign for Chrome, or am I missing it all
#4
Jill
-
- Admin
-
- 32,315 posts
High Rankings Advisor
Posted 04 January 2012 - 09:42 AM
Google's Chrome Page No Longer Ranks For Browser After Sponsored Post Penalty
They've been penalized for asking people to write sponsored articles about them and having a link point to them from one of the sponsored articles.
What they should have been penalized for, however, was paying to have low quality garbage content added online which would potentially help them rank better from Chrome and browser keyword phrases.
QUOTE
Am I missing something here with the whole Google penalised situation? Have they been penalised for putting a link on a 3rd party website?
They've been penalized for asking people to write sponsored articles about them and having a link point to them from one of the sponsored articles.
What they should have been penalized for, however, was paying to have low quality garbage content added online which would potentially help them rank better from Chrome and browser keyword phrases.
#5
swirly
-
- Members
-
- 4 posts
HR 1
Posted 04 January 2012 - 09:47 AM
So they have not been penalised for having a link on a site its because it's been paid for?
#6
Jill
-
- Admin
-
- 32,315 posts
High Rankings Advisor
Posted 04 January 2012 - 10:02 AM
Exactly. It's not against any guidelines for sites to link to other sites. Only to pay for sites to link to you.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
