Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Subscribe to HRA Now!


Are you a Google Analytics enthusiast?

Share and download Custom Google Analytics Reports, dashboards and advanced segments--for FREE! 




From the folks who brought you High Rankings!


Googles New Ssl Change

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
2 replies to this topic

#1 Bri


    HR 4

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 207 posts
  • Location:Toronto, Ontario

Posted 03 January 2012 - 11:59 AM

Ok, am i missing something here? this article actually used the word Apocalypse, but i can't really find anything worthy to note here. sure people signed in at Google.com are not going to yield any info in GA when it comes to referrer info. it's a small percentage of information just go and look at the keywords coming from the other 89%! lol

Can someone tell me if there's something i'm overlooking?


#2 Michael Martinez

Michael Martinez

    HR 10

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,325 posts
  • Location:Georgia

Posted 03 January 2012 - 01:57 PM

Some people are very dependent upon Google Analytics' keyword data. Some people are very dependent upon Google for traffic. And some people are so tied in to groups of Google+ users that their "(not provided)" data may constitute 25-33% of Google referrals.

I have wildly varying percentages in my own data for "(not provided)" depending on whether the site is technical (SEO Theory) or personal (Xenite.Org). Personally, I'm not too concerned. I've always had to deal with blindspots in keyword activity for one reason or another.

#3 chrishirst


    A not so moderate moderator.

  • Moderator
  • 7,718 posts
  • Location:Blackpool UK

Posted 03 January 2012 - 05:11 PM

Ok, am i missing something here?
Yes you are!

This ->

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

We are now a read-only forum.
No new posts or registrations allowed.