Are you a Google Analytics enthusiast?
More SEO Content
To Cms Or Not To Cms?
Posted 19 December 2011 - 02:48 PM
Posted 19 December 2011 - 04:26 PM
Posted 19 December 2011 - 04:48 PM
Just as much control. but because it is inserted server side, it never exists in its own right to get separately indexed.
Posted 19 December 2011 - 08:17 PM
Posted 20 December 2011 - 07:53 AM
Posted 20 December 2011 - 02:03 PM
A Div inserted as a php include will be served up as part of the containing page. It therefore becomes part of the stored text that is retrieved. Thereby helping SEO rather than being treated as a completely self contained page that If retrieved at all will be treated as a stand alone orphan that may in some circumstances get independently indexed.
So I reckon that makes the does it or doesn't it discussion pretty much redundant.
Posted 20 December 2011 - 02:46 PM
I'm not trying to vindicate iframes -- I just want to see if people who feel they are crawled (from the iframe SRC link) are correct. I've been telling people for years not to be concerned about seeing their iframes crawled if they don't link normally to the framed pages. I need to stop saying that if it's no longer true.
The problem with proving/disproving such statements is that no test is infallible. For example, the sites that republish content they gleaned through iframes can screw up any test. I think I have picked a site that hasn't yet been exploited for my test but I cannot be 100% sure.
If I see that iFramed text is now being crawled and indexed, that will leave only a couple of undesirable methods for embedding text on a page that you don't want indexed.
I really wish Google and Bing had adopted Yahoo!'s block-level NoIndex tag.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users