I have a client who for years has been making redirects in their .htaccess file like this:
Redirect /friendly-name/index.php http://www.abc.com/id/em-xyz/index.php
They set up "friendly" URLs that actually never have a real page located at them and redirect them to a more complex URL, but they do it in such a way that the engines see the destination URL as a 302 redirect, but since there are links pointing to the "friendly" URL that juice never is passed to the actual (the "complex") URL.
They say they've always done it that way and why change? I believe that they should set up the redirects as Redirect 301 and they'll get the link juice!
Like this:
Redirect 301 /friendly-name/index.php http://www.abc.com/id/em-xyz/index.php
Right?
Thanks,
Rosemary
Are you a Google Analytics enthusiast?
Share and download Custom Google Analytics Reports, dashboards and advanced segments--for FREE!

www.CustomReportSharing.com
From the folks who brought you High Rankings!
More SEO Content
International SEM | Social Media | Search Friendly Design | SEO | Paid Search / PPC | Seminars | Forum Threads | Q&A | Copywriting | Keyword Research | Web Analytics / Conversions | Blogging | Dynamic Sites | Linking | SEO Services | Site Architecture | Search Engine Spam | Wrap-ups | Business Issues | HRA Questions | Online Courses
Convincing Client To Change Redirects To 301 For Link Juice
Started by
ttw
, Jun 09 2010 02:46 PM
6 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 09 June 2010 - 02:46 PM
#2
Posted 09 June 2010 - 03:05 PM
Yes. You are correct. With 302s the old URLs will also get indexed which you typically don't want, although there are exceptions.
#3
Posted 10 June 2010 - 10:56 AM
Maybe this is a separate issue, but why wouldn't they rewrite the old URLs to the friendly ones? That way, they'd get all of the benefits of the friendly URLs.
#4
Posted 10 June 2010 - 06:21 PM
Are you trying to address some basic problem in their search visibility or is this just a case of dotting i's and crossing t's because it sticks out like a sore thumb? I mean, if this has been going on for years, it seems like they have never felt compelled to do anything about it. Do they dominate in their niche? If so, then I wouldn't lose any sleep over it.
#5
Posted 15 June 2010 - 08:11 AM
Maybe this is a separate issue, but why wouldn't they rewrite the old URLs to the friendly ones? That way, they'd get all of the benefits of the friendly URLs.
I agree with qwerty. And also I would drop the index.php as that shouldn't be needed. It can cause canonization issues.
#6
Posted 15 June 2010 - 09:06 AM
Personally I would tell them that while it might have been fine for years, there is always the possibility that in the future this might not be seen as fine, and it would be a shame to find out the hard way due to a slapping from Google.
#7
Posted 15 June 2010 - 12:29 PM
In any case, Matt Cutts has stated that there is a slight reduction in PageRank with even a 301 redirect, so it's better to avoid the need for such a redirect.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









