SEO Class in Chicago, IL
Learn How To Optimize Your Website on July 26, 2013
High Rankings is offering a 1-day customized SEO training class in Chicago. Class size is limited so please sign-up now if you want in!
Are you a Google Analytics enthusiast?
Share and download Custom Google Analytics Reports, dashboards and advanced segments--for FREE!

www.CustomReportSharing.com
From the folks who brought you High Rankings!
More SEO Content
Keywords In Domain Name
#1
Posted 21 February 2010 - 12:05 PM
#2
Posted 21 February 2010 - 01:00 PM
#3
Posted 21 February 2010 - 04:52 PM
However, that isn't really important, because of what Jill said, and she's right about that imho.
You should find a healthy balance between creating your website for the visitors and optimizing it for the search engines, but at the end of the day it should look good to your visitors most of all.
keywords in domain name are good (but not necessary), and having all of the keywords in the domain name (if were talking about a 4 word keyword phrase) is definitely overdone, considering what little search engine benefit it offers.
I think thiking along those lines (wanting to get all the kw's in the domain name) is a typical beginner's mistake - one that I've made, too LOL, so I know what Im talking about
The furthest I would go in your example is BogusBeachEstate com. That one, I think, would be a good balance between the two (probably actually a bit too keyword heavy).
Look at this site for example: HighRankings is memorable and descriptive of the site, not lots of keyword mashed together.
#4
Posted 22 February 2010 - 08:30 PM
I would be interested in what you think the difference is?
#5
Posted 15 June 2011 - 08:29 AM
I have a question about the domain name importance.
If you do a google search for custom-house-plans you will see listed a new site that according to the wayback machine has only been crawled one time since 2008 and been in number one ranking for a short time.
It only has a PR of 0
HOW can this be?
#6
Posted 15 June 2011 - 12:33 PM
I have a question about the domain name importance.
If you do a google search for custom-house-plans you will see listed a new site that according to the wayback machine has only been crawled one time since 2008 and been in number one ranking for a short time.
It only has a PR of 0
HOW can this be?
Things change over time.
#7
Posted 15 June 2011 - 02:57 PM
Google erroneously (in my opinion) puts tons and tons of weighting on the domain name, which makes it easy to rank highly for just that one factor.
#8
Posted 15 June 2011 - 04:01 PM
That SEOs were able to leverage the exact-match domain names may have forced Google to downgrade the value of keywords-in-domain/URL -- or maybe Panda took care of all that.
#9
Posted 16 June 2011 - 07:09 AM
#10
Posted 16 June 2011 - 01:45 PM
They were never very special in the first place. It's like sifting through all the marbles in your friend's bag, picking all the green ones and putting them on the floor, and saying, "You only play with green marbles".
#11
Posted 16 June 2011 - 06:56 PM
#12
Posted 16 June 2011 - 07:09 PM
I don't think it ever existed except in the minds of SEOs who made it happen through a placebo effect.
Google has conceded for many years that it gave some value to keywords-in-URL. It was only this year or late last year that they acknowledged that people were upset about "exact match domains" but if you go back and look at their responses, they always struck me as somewhat perplexed. "We're looking into that" Matt Cutts said a time or two.
Who looks into something that is happening exactly the way people think it's happening?
The real power of an exact-match domain is that it's easy to remember (people are already using the term for search) and many of the links will use the domain name as anchor text rather than specific (or inspecific) expressions.
The "EMD boost" was always more of a secondary effect of funneling targeted anchor text into a domain. It never needed to be more than that. And no one has ever shown that it was more than that.
Now that SEOs believe that Exact Match Domains have been downgraded by Panda, they are abandoning the practice of optimizing with EMDs -- hence, they no longer see any "evidence" that EMDs work. Therefore, they must be correct in concluding that there was an Exact-Match-Domain boost all along.
It's circular, illogical, and self-perpetuating unscientific opinion that created a marketing craze.
#13
Posted 16 June 2011 - 09:54 PM
Matt Cutts has stated they are looking into it but who knows what that means or how long it will take. Right now its the easiest way to "spam" your way into the results.
#14
Posted 17 June 2011 - 04:44 PM
#15
Posted 17 June 2011 - 10:33 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









