Are you a Google Analytics enthusiast?
More SEO Content
New Ftc Guidelines
Posted 07 October 2009 - 09:50 AM
That's probably the way it should have always been. Bloggers who are recommending products or services and are being paid (in any way) should have been disclosing that they're being compensated. I have no issue with this whatsoever.
That said, when I read through the doc I found that the scope went a lot farther than simply blog poster recommendations. So I sent it over to one of my attorneys to have a look at it. An attorney who just happened to work at the FTC in the past so has good insight into these things. He's already coming up with several other Gotchas he says I'll need to watch out for. The main issue being the use of customer testimonials on any web site, or specifically what those testimonials say.
The gist of it being there is no longer a Safe Harbor provision after these Guideline changes. Meaning if you use a testimonial where a customer gives specific results you can no longer simply include the old blanket statement about their results may not be typical for the average consumer. Instead, now you have to say they're not typical and spell out what the typical results are! The Heat Pump example they give in the documentation (Page 66) is one I find to be pretty instructive as to what they expect.
The bottom line as I'm seeing it at the moment is that you simply cannot have specific results in your testimonials anymore because Safe Harbor is gone. If you do include any of these types of testimonials (I saved $XXX or I made $XXX) you need to also take great care to actually know and explain what typical results should be expected. You need to spell it out in full detail, which in my world means I simply won't use such testimonials, or in the case where user comments are enabled allow anyone to make such a testimonial that appears on any of my sites.
On the other hand if you have testimonials that simply state that someone loves you or loves your product service, with no mention of specific results, you're probably pretty safe. Thankfully that's what 99.9% of my testimonials are since I started moving this direction years ago.
To put it another way, Opinions in testimonials are still okay. Specific results aren't.
Of course I'm not a lawyer and this is not legal advice. I'm just throwing out there what I'm reading in the new guidelines and being told by my attorney, as well as asking what others what they're seeing in the new Guidelines and/or are being told by their legal representatives.
If they enforce the new provisions, and I think we have to assume they will, this marks a huge shift in how some have been marketing their products. Every time in the past I've seen something like this happen it seems to open up huge opportunities for those who take the time and make the effort to do the right thing. Usually competition takes a fairly large hit because too many who don't want to make the effort simply close up shop or get driven out of business for not minding the new rules. So at the very least you'll want to make sure you're on the right side of the law if you do business in the US. And if play your cards right you could see some pretty substantial improvement in your business over the next couple of years as those who don't or don't want to abide by the rules fall by the wayside.
Posted 07 October 2009 - 10:05 AM
It seems that many marketers today, especially online marketers, have gotten farther and farther away from following FTC guidelines. It will be interesting to see if these new rules change the way online marketers do business.
Posted 07 October 2009 - 10:25 AM
FWIW, I do think you'll see a fairly significant change happen over the next year or two. The little birdie who is my lawyer apparently put in a call to some folks he knows who are still at the FTC. Word inside the walls there is that the fines will allow them to spend a lot more time and resources, so they'll be hitting them hard as soon as it goes into effect December 1. In fact, the word was that they'd already identified several dozen large and small folks to go after right away to start making an example of to encourage everyone to toe the line.
It sounds like we won't be waiting long to see the first action happen. Anybody who chooses to ignore the new guidelines or thumb their nose at the FTC is asking for trouble. And it sounds like it's probably going to find them.
Posted 07 October 2009 - 01:29 PM
I think another gotcha in the document, but probably a good one, is that they require organizations to define a process whereby more than one individual is involved in creating or approving any endorsement by the organizations on behalf of others. That is, simply being the "spokesperson" for your company or NGO or whatever won't be sufficient if you're going to endorse something on behalf of the company -- you'll need to be able to show that other people in the organization were involved in making the decision to endorse whatever was endorsed.
Posted 09 October 2009 - 02:05 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users