Are you a Google Analytics enthusiast?
More SEO Content
Ding Dong The Tag Is Dead
Posted 09 October 2009 - 07:42 PM
Frankly, I'm kinda surprised that OWG and other's tests show it didn't index it. Not sure what the tests were.
If anyone wants to know my secret word, let me know and I'll pm you. I don't want to say it publicly because others might make it public thus affecting the test.
Posted 10 October 2009 - 12:52 PM
Posted 10 October 2009 - 01:31 PM
Posted 11 October 2009 - 09:15 AM
But I just searched for my second word that's on a different page, which apparently is now indexed by yahoo, and what they showed was a search results page from my own site search. Funny thing is it was a site search for the exact word I was testing! They're not, however, pulling up the actual page of my site where the word is in the Meta keyword tag. This page is one level deeper down in my site from my first test, which might mean it's in a sort of supplementary results database if they do things at all like Google.
Now, I never did a site search on my site for that word, nor had I even told anyone about that second word. I had done a few searches at Yahoo for it over the past few days, however.
So I'm really not sure how or why they would put that word into our site search engine and then index the resulting page. (I've since blocked the search results pages in general from being indexed...which I thought I had already done, but apparently I hadn't.)
Posted 11 October 2009 - 09:48 AM
Posted 11 October 2009 - 09:55 AM
In a way, choosing words in the meta keyword tag to fill in as it appears Yahoo has done makes a lot of sense.
Posted 12 October 2009 - 08:39 AM
Posted 19 October 2009 - 08:35 AM
So, I can conclude that having a meta keyword that matches the page content is a kind of immunity against spam (even for 1%) ?
If so, Yes meta keywords may have a certain positive affect ! at least for new websites .. no?
Posted 19 October 2009 - 08:50 AM
Posted 19 October 2009 - 10:23 AM
You can conclude meta keywords has any effect if you want. But you'd be wrong in Google at least. Test it for yourself, it's not that hard.
Posted 19 October 2009 - 11:28 AM
Hey Randy, why you seem angry about me?
I don't have the level to put theories .. I'm just trying to gather information (It happens to be from stupid question or notice sometimes) ..But it works!
And this time I have a proof :
Thanks for the info
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users