Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Subscribe to HRA Now!


Are you a Google Analytics enthusiast?

Share and download Custom Google Analytics Reports, dashboards and advanced segments--for FREE! 




From the folks who brought you High Rankings!

- - - - -

Duplicate Content Or Not

  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 Pragueguy


    HR 1

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 3 posts

Posted 12 August 2009 - 07:32 AM

Right now I am redesigning one of my oldest websites, [domain reference removed]
When I launched it 4 years ago, I didn't know anything about SEO, and I had a SEO firm do some work for me. Quite successfully.
But as a part of redesigning the website I have also decided to do the SEO myself. And in that process I would like to change some URLs on pages on the website.
However - the old pages have been indexed on the search engines already, and of course I would like to take advantage of that until the new ones are indexed. And I would of course also like to keep the juice from incoming links to some of these pages.

So I am considering this:

Naming the URLs as I believe is best, taking SEO into consideration. And of course including these URLs in the internal link structure of my website - and

Keeping an exact copy of these pages with the old URLs - and not including them in the internal link structure of the website

My reason would be that I would for some time maintain the benefit from the old URLs until the new ones sort of take over. And hopefully I would not be punished for duplicate content as the old URLs would no longer be part of my sitemap and therefore not be indexed by the search engines anymore.
Obviously the pages will contaiun all the links to the rest of my websites, so nobody will feel that they are on a "strange page" - thet can simply move on from there.

Is this a good way of doing it?

Kind regards

Laus, Prague

#2 Randy


    Convert Me!

  • Moderator
  • 17,540 posts

Posted 12 August 2009 - 07:48 AM

Welcome Pragueguy ! hi.gif

First off, you're asking for trouble if you believe changing the file names and or path structure to work in your keywords is going to carry any great SEO benefit. Dunno where you've been reading, but what you're proposing is the single biggest mistake I see people make time and time again. Not only do keyword stuffed urls not carry a lot of weight with the search engines, you're actively disconnecting all of your previous efforts from your current site.

So to start off with, you may want to reconsider what you intend to do and more importantly why you're wanting to do it. If it's for the search engines only with no usability improvement for real users or is not something that's required because you're installing a new cms or cart you'll probably want to hold off on this thought.

That said, anytime you have to change your url structure you'll want to set up 301 redirects that point from each of the old urls to the best possible new url. The 301's will take care of any users who end up at those old pages, no matter how they arrive there, and get them to the new pages. They also help send a signal to the search engines that the old pages have been replaced with other pages, thereby causing them to pass along the authority, trust and link pop the old pages had to the new pages.

We have a whole section of the forums dedicated to 301's redirects. It's down in the Technology section.

#3 bwelford


    HR 5

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 484 posts
  • Location:Langley, British Columbia, Canada

Posted 12 August 2009 - 08:40 AM

If others have linked to the old URLs it is important to try to get them changed. Do a google search for the particular URL and see where it may be found. Then contact the website owner and ask them to change the URL.

As Randy said, the permanent 301 redirect is the right way to go and is very effective. I've recently moved two websites and the 301 redirects work just fine. The search engine rankings are maintained.

One frustration is that Google seems to hang on to the old URLs for a long time. So you can find them in the Google index even though anyone going to the old URL will end up on the new URL. I think this persistance means that the redirect process is less than 100% efficient in transferring all the old PR juice.

#4 Pragueguy


    HR 1

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 3 posts

Posted 12 August 2009 - 08:42 AM

Thank you - this was VERY useful information!
I'll just use the exact same path structure as before - and avoid any problems.
Hopefully I'll be able to make higher quality content in the new version and thus enhance my results clapping.gif

Kind regards


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

We are now a read-only forum.
No new posts or registrations allowed.