On the web, no-one can see your shame...
Are you a Google Analytics enthusiast?
Share and download Custom Google Analytics Reports, dashboards and advanced segments--for FREE!

www.CustomReportSharing.com
From the folks who brought you High Rankings!
More SEO Content
Name And Shame (yourselves)
#1
Posted 26 February 2004 - 12:24 PM
On the web, no-one can see your shame...
#2
Posted 26 February 2004 - 12:35 PM
Webstream
#3
Posted 26 February 2004 - 02:10 PM
#4
Posted 26 February 2004 - 05:51 PM
Oh my... what a headline! Check this out. This is when I had a much broader focus.
Old site with old company name.
#5
Posted 26 February 2004 - 06:00 PM
Weirdly I just wrote a bit about the common mistakes that new businesses make with regard advertising.
NO WAY am I going to put up the 98 site, what little credibility i do have would be washed away like yesterdays snow.
#6
Posted 26 February 2004 - 07:02 PM
http://web.archive.o...om/alphaserver/
It looks a lot better than the original from early '96 that had a huge, useless graphic of outer space. We initially weren't allowed to use <table> tags, which made displaying all the product specs quite frustrating!
There was a lot more freedom in those days. Managers thought the web was mysterious and magic -- and were quick to throw money at it! WWW was like the wild wild west. Now it's all grown up.
-Andrea-
#7
Posted 26 February 2004 - 07:23 PM
http://web.archive.o...ood/Hills/4360/
This was a fun little thing, despite the fact that the site looked like crap. It listed internet contact information for celebrities and it gave me the opportunity to correspond with some pretty famous people. Jackie Chan, Adam Sandler, Rodney Dangerfield, and several others whose names are escaping me right now all visted the site at one point or another. Most of the time, though, I ended up talking with agents and representatives. <shrug> Was a fun little hobby and, though the site wasn't dynamically generated, you can see in the celebrity e-mail database that I was already in the mindset of what was eventually to come.
Fun stuff.
G.
#8
Posted 26 February 2004 - 11:48 PM
The second earliest is bad enough.
#9
Posted 27 February 2004 - 03:31 AM
September 2003 ... mm, struggling with Typo3's idea of templates.... bad idea...
And finally in [url="http://www.the-happycouple.com"]2004 we end up with the current incarnation... Can you say: moved away from minimalist design?
Ruud
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users








