Are you a Google Analytics enthusiast?
More SEO Content
Keyword Tool Local Search Volumes
Posted 26 May 2009 - 06:23 PM
After refinement, the local search volume data returned looked a bit suspect (volumes slightly too high for what I would have expected), so I returned the settings to 'English, United Kingdom' and ran the phrases again - the local search volume was exactly the same.
So I then tried the External Keyword Tool via Google Australia (https://adwords.goog....rdToolExternal) and... the search volume was exactly the same.
Which leaves me wondering... Is Google faulty? Is 'local' search volume returned on the basis of your IP address? What's the point of the locality settings if all volumes returned are the same?
Posted 27 May 2009 - 02:38 AM
If so, I'm not sure how it works for local searches. I can't remember ever seeing them say anything at all about how they come up with those numbers.
You may be better served by using the local keyword feature of a tool like Keyword Discovery for such research. Because it certainly sounds like Google is doing something funky if they all show the same data.
Posted 27 May 2009 - 09:10 AM
- 11,100,000 per month! Maybe it's immigrant poms reminding themselves about their favourite supermarket? Or have Tesco started to move into Australia as well?
I also looked up "shark attacks" thinking it must be much higher in Australia, but the UK was a shade higher. Guess it must be the higher population and morbid outlook :-) You might be suffering a similar skew that brings the numbers to be about the same. Experiment with other searches... in my experience Google keyword seems pretty accurate. And so it should be -- Google don't need to do anything complicated to get these numbers.
Posted 27 May 2009 - 12:57 PM
Randy, I've always been quite wary of Keyword Discovery. I've tried it before (the free version) and the volumes returned seem to be incredibly low for the phrases I've researched. Maybe it's not a problem for US-centric data, but I didn't trust what I was seeing for UK search data.
My philosophy has been that, with Google's Keyword Tool, the data must be "straight from the horse's mouth", so to speak, even if it isn't always deadly accurate. After seeing endless debates about how accurate it is, I just decided to stick with it regardless.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users