Are you a Google Analytics enthusiast?
Share and download Custom Google Analytics Reports, dashboards and advanced segments--for FREE!

www.CustomReportSharing.com
From the folks who brought you High Rankings!
More SEO Content
International SEM | Social Media | Search Friendly Design | SEO | Paid Search / PPC | Seminars | Forum Threads | Q&A | Copywriting | Keyword Research | Web Analytics / Conversions | Blogging | Dynamic Sites | Linking | SEO Services | Site Architecture | Search Engine Spam | Wrap-ups | Business Issues | HRA Questions | Online Courses
Are My Roi Calculations Off?
Started by
azraelmustdye
, Feb 18 2004 01:25 PM
5 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 18 February 2004 - 01:25 PM
I'm attempting to compile ROI statistics but the results appear skewed to higher monthly searches.
Here's what I know:
keyword: $5.01 Cost-per-click
last Month's searches at Overture: 7679 searches
my conservative estimate of how much traffic to expect (market share of those searches): 0.50%
what the law firm usually accepts as a case (conversion percentage): 5%
so ('searches' * 'traffic share' * 'cost-per-click') / 'case conversion percentage'
or:
( 7679 * 0.50% * $5.01 ) / 5% = $2,249.95 cost-per-case
The main function of this exercise is to determine the advertising efficiency of many keywords at once. With this result I'll be able to compare cost-per-case figures, selecting the best combination of price and traffic - traffic could be low enough that the keyword converts several months, even years later, making the term insignificant.
Any suggestions on what I'm doing wrong / right?
Here's what I know:
keyword: $5.01 Cost-per-click
last Month's searches at Overture: 7679 searches
my conservative estimate of how much traffic to expect (market share of those searches): 0.50%
what the law firm usually accepts as a case (conversion percentage): 5%
so ('searches' * 'traffic share' * 'cost-per-click') / 'case conversion percentage'
or:
( 7679 * 0.50% * $5.01 ) / 5% = $2,249.95 cost-per-case
The main function of this exercise is to determine the advertising efficiency of many keywords at once. With this result I'll be able to compare cost-per-case figures, selecting the best combination of price and traffic - traffic could be low enough that the keyword converts several months, even years later, making the term insignificant.
Any suggestions on what I'm doing wrong / right?
#2
Posted 18 February 2004 - 04:08 PM
Hello azraelmustdye:
I think some of your assumptions might be off slightly, but lets see what I get (I am figuring this out as I write):
7679 Searchs X .005 (0.5% CTR) = 39 Clicks
39 Clicks X $5.01 CPC = $195.39 Total Spend
39 Clicks X .05 (5% Conversion Rate) = 2 Conversions
$195.39 Total Spend / 2 Conversions = $97.70 Cost per Conversion
Yeah your calculation was off a little
I think some of your assumptions might be off slightly, but lets see what I get (I am figuring this out as I write):
7679 Searchs X .005 (0.5% CTR) = 39 Clicks
39 Clicks X $5.01 CPC = $195.39 Total Spend
39 Clicks X .05 (5% Conversion Rate) = 2 Conversions
$195.39 Total Spend / 2 Conversions = $97.70 Cost per Conversion
Yeah your calculation was off a little
#3
Posted 18 February 2004 - 04:27 PM
The numbers all round have been mis-evaluated...
First the CTR of .5% is low... obviously you are not near the top spots with a CTR of that small size... if you are in the top 2-3 you should be getting a 2-8% CTR.... now conversion rate is another story.... and the numbers can be impacted by the creative used...
Vester your equation is right just the numbers are off...
First the CTR of .5% is low... obviously you are not near the top spots with a CTR of that small size... if you are in the top 2-3 you should be getting a 2-8% CTR.... now conversion rate is another story.... and the numbers can be impacted by the creative used...
Vester your equation is right just the numbers are off...
#4
Posted 18 February 2004 - 06:30 PM
Forget conversion rates: just quote total cost.
39 Clicks X $5.01 CPC = $195.39 Total Spend (PER MONTH)
They will spend about $1,000 a year. Not a lot of money, really. When talking about ROI, the conversion rate doesn't really apply, in terms of "looking ahead". What it applies to is simply how much XYZ someone needs to sell to break even, e.g.
Total monthly spend = $5,000,
Average margin == 25%.
Total sales needed to break even == 100 / Margin * Total Monthly spend == 100 / 25 * 5000 == $20,000.
The CPA (Cost Per Acquisition) may be important, especially for a law firm, but that is very different to ROI.
<added> OK, forget all that. ROI can not be measured in advance (I knew something was up with that. Bit of a hangover unfortunately). ROI is impossible to work out, as no two law suits ever get the same payout. So without knowing the R, the o and the I are pretty meaningless.
What you really wanna calculate is: CPA (Cost per Acquisition).
Which is: Total output / total sales. Simple!!!!
Now back to my hangover...GROAN</added>
39 Clicks X $5.01 CPC = $195.39 Total Spend (PER MONTH)
They will spend about $1,000 a year. Not a lot of money, really. When talking about ROI, the conversion rate doesn't really apply, in terms of "looking ahead". What it applies to is simply how much XYZ someone needs to sell to break even, e.g.
Total monthly spend = $5,000,
Average margin == 25%.
Total sales needed to break even == 100 / Margin * Total Monthly spend == 100 / 25 * 5000 == $20,000.
The CPA (Cost Per Acquisition) may be important, especially for a law firm, but that is very different to ROI.
<added> OK, forget all that. ROI can not be measured in advance (I knew something was up with that. Bit of a hangover unfortunately). ROI is impossible to work out, as no two law suits ever get the same payout. So without knowing the R, the o and the I are pretty meaningless.
What you really wanna calculate is: CPA (Cost per Acquisition).
Which is: Total output / total sales. Simple!!!!
Now back to my hangover...GROAN</added>
Edited by projectphp, 18 February 2004 - 10:13 PM.
#5
Posted 18 February 2004 - 07:35 PM
You're dividing when you should be multiplying.
#6
Posted 19 February 2004 - 09:23 AM
Thanks All!
Aussie - You're absolutely right with 2-8% - I was just being conservative, as in the absolute worst case scenario without being disabled by Google.
Vertster - Good looks on the correction. I knew it was skewed upwards, I just couldn't put my finger on it.
Projectphp - I thought I'd escaped that breakeven calculation. ha
Aussie - You're absolutely right with 2-8% - I was just being conservative, as in the absolute worst case scenario without being disabled by Google.
Vertster - Good looks on the correction. I knew it was skewed upwards, I just couldn't put my finger on it.
Projectphp - I thought I'd escaped that breakeven calculation. ha
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users







