Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Subscribe to HRA Now!

 



Are you a Google Analytics enthusiast?

Share and download Custom Google Analytics Reports, dashboards and advanced segments--for FREE! 

 



 

 www.CustomReportSharing.com 

From the folks who brought you High Rankings!


Sponsored Content

 

 
 

Photo

Yahoo Announces Ink Pfi Inclusion


  • Please log in to reply
34 replies to this topic

#16 ephricon

ephricon

    HR 4

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 236 posts
  • Location:over there -->

Posted 18 February 2004 - 01:08 PM

God bless this revelation!

Hopefully Yahoo will pick up steam and get some more usage. Even better - hopefully Google will do some serious thinking about their current algo and filters, etc....

#17 Shep

Shep

    HR 2

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 13 posts
  • Location:PA, USA

Posted 18 February 2004 - 03:24 PM

I was curious why this discussion is taking place in Paid Inclusion/Trusted Feed forum? I was checking out one of my main sites in the new Yahoo and I am doing very well. Actually I am doing better than I ever dreamed that is possible with any search engine. I never paid for any inclusion or even directories like Yahoo.
I am still relatively new in the whole SEO as this is only my first year in SEO.

Is there also free listings in the new Yahoo?

#18 qwerty

qwerty

    HR 10

  • Moderator
  • 8,295 posts
  • Location:Somerville, MA

Posted 18 February 2004 - 03:57 PM

Is there also free listings in the new Yahoo?

Absolutely. I'm in there without paying anything. But it does appear that a Yahoo directory listing helps (I noticed that for one of my clients) and Barry seems quite certain that PFI gives you a boost in the SERP as well.

#19 websage

websage

    WebSage

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 362 posts
  • Location:Arlington, VA, USA

Posted 18 February 2004 - 04:01 PM

Just to clarify, to submit a site to Yahoo Search for free you need to have a Yahoo account. Also, Yahoo claims that it does not guarantee inclusion.

#20 qwerty

qwerty

    HR 10

  • Moderator
  • 8,295 posts
  • Location:Somerville, MA

Posted 18 February 2004 - 04:25 PM

I didn't find anything about submitting a site to the search, even when I was logged in to Yahoo. I did find this, however:

Yahoo! Search crawls the web every 2-4 weeks and automatically finds new content for indexing. If pages already in the Yahoo! Search index link to your site, it will be considered for inclusion in the next update of the index. Getting your site listed in major directory services such as the Yahoo! Directory and DMOZ is an excellent way to be sure that there are links to your site.


From http://help.yahoo.co...ndexing-06.html

#21 qwerty

qwerty

    HR 10

  • Moderator
  • 8,295 posts
  • Location:Somerville, MA

Posted 18 February 2004 - 04:30 PM

Hm... some other interesting stuff. This seems to be a modified version of the Inktomi guidelines.

Use a "description" meta-tag and write your description accurately and carefully. After the title, the description is the most important draw for users. Make sure the document title and description attract the interest of the user but also fit the content on your site.

Use a "keyword" meta-tag to list key words for the document. Use a distinct list of keywords that relate to the specific page on your site instead of using one broad set of keywords for every page.


This one's from http://help.yahoo.co...ranking-02.html
I knew INK mildly recommended the use of the keyword tag, but they're saying it right out, and adding the meta description too. Maybe those tags are going to be a lot more important that they'd been in the past.

#22 melville7

melville7

    HR 1

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 3 posts

Posted 19 February 2004 - 10:23 AM

Will they not go to a CPC model like Looksmart did?

#23 GeordieSEO

GeordieSEO

    Haway The Lads

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 208 posts
  • Location:Newcastle Upon Tyne / Teesside, UK

Posted 19 February 2004 - 10:37 AM

I don't think they will follow Looksmart's mistakes.

The only information I could get out of PositionTech about the Yahoo PFI was the press release from Inktomi which has already been posted.

What it does mean that the free trial for existing customers will be for pages with Inkomi PFI

#24 mcanerin

mcanerin

    HR 7

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,242 posts
  • Location:Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Posted 19 February 2004 - 12:59 PM

Actually, I just read the Yahoo Inclusion guidelines and apparently they no longer offer free directory inclusion for commercial sites. You have to pay.

Since that's not what it said the last time I was there, I can only assume this is a change from a couple days ago. :huh:

Ian

#25 qwerty

qwerty

    HR 10

  • Moderator
  • 8,295 posts
  • Location:Somerville, MA

Posted 19 February 2004 - 01:10 PM

I thought it had been that way for years, Ian -- that only non-commercial sites could get into the directory for free. I remember getting my old company in for free years ago, and deciding not to send them a correction when we moved to a different town because I was afraid they'd make us pay to remain in the directory. That was in 2000.

#26 torka

torka

    Vintage Babe

  • Moderator
  • 4,392 posts
  • Location:Triangle area, NC, USA, Earth (usually)

Posted 19 February 2004 - 01:45 PM

Yeah, qwerty, that was what I thought too. Something like $299 to be considered for listing in commercial categories in the .com directory, and if you were accepted, $299 per year to be allowed to stay there.

From what I recall, though, there was some possibility of getting in cheaper or even free to regional categories, at least for a while. Hadn't checked that recently, so I dunno if that was still there or not.

And, of course, if you were a non-commercial site in non-commercial category, you could submit for free. Just no guarantees on how long you'd be waiting for a decison on your submission (kinda like DMOZ! :doh: )

But I could be totally wrong. I haven't paid much attention to the Yahoo directory in quite some time.

--Torka :huh:

#27 AlDugan

AlDugan

    HR 5

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 467 posts
  • Location:Keene, NH

Posted 19 February 2004 - 02:17 PM

The new Yahoo results are very exciting. Finally some competition for Google.

Interesting thing -- At my home computer I see the new Yahoo results but at work I still get the old Google Yahoo results ( just a few towns aways ). Wonder when the switch will be 100% complete.

#28 mcanerin

mcanerin

    HR 7

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,242 posts
  • Location:Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Posted 19 February 2004 - 05:08 PM

So it's breaking onto 2 markets:

Google, using DMOZ as backup and authority
Inktomi, using Yahoo as backup and authority

It's probably a good idea to combine human editing with spidering. I wonder how long it's going to be before we hear the announcement of MSN's new directory?

Oh, wait, here it is... http://beta.search.m...om/default.aspx :huh:

And from the looks of it, it's hand edited and being started from scratch.

Ian

#29 awall19

awall19

    Peanut Butter Lover

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 502 posts

Posted 19 February 2004 - 06:08 PM

Nice find on the MSN directory.
I wonder if they will be accepting editors?
I would like to edit the corporate anti trust category.

#30 mcanerin

mcanerin

    HR 7

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,242 posts
  • Location:Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Posted 19 February 2004 - 06:19 PM

:eek: :lol:




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users