Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Subscribe to HRA Now!

 



Are you a Google Analytics enthusiast?

Share and download Custom Google Analytics Reports, dashboards and advanced segments--for FREE! 

 



 

 www.CustomReportSharing.com 

From the folks who brought you High Rankings!



Photo
- - - - -

Triple Linking


  • Please log in to reply
24 replies to this topic

#16 Randy

Randy

    Convert Me!

  • Moderator
  • 17,540 posts

Posted 05 December 2008 - 01:46 PM

QUOTE(1dmf)
Randy, sounds like you got far too many sites, PR , ranking and IBL's , wanna trade?


No. fork_off.gif

FTR, my reference to Round Robin Linking is just Randy-speak for all of those 3-way, 4-way and 19-way linking schemes designed to fool the search engines. I use Round Robin because no matter where you start, if you follow the trail of birdseed far enough you'll end up back where you started.

#17 1dmf

1dmf

    Keep Asking, Keep Questioning, Keep Learning

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,161 posts
  • Location:Worthing - England

Posted 08 December 2008 - 05:56 AM

lol ok, ok, step away from the pitch fork! you devil!

I guessed it was more a Randy coloquism rather than an industry standardisation, but I like it, you should patent it and then sue everyone who uses the 'Round Robin Linking Matriflux Method' without prior consent!





#18 Randy

Randy

    Convert Me!

  • Moderator
  • 17,540 posts

Posted 08 December 2008 - 07:25 AM

hysterical.gif

There's only one problem with your suggestion 1dmf. And that's that I absolutely, positively detest lawyers. Really I do. And with good reason. whistling.gif

This personal aversion would throw a monkey wrench into the equation since I'd never sue because I never want to have to hire and pay a lawyer again in my life if I can keep from it.

#19 jsp1983

jsp1983

    HR 3

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 98 posts
  • Location:Blackpool, UK

Posted 29 April 2009 - 03:51 PM

How about 'almost' 3-way links?

How about this example:

Site A - the site from which a link is being solicited
Site B - the site for which the link is being requested
Site C - the site for which a link (and some content) is being offered to Site A

- All of the sites' content relate to the same industry and the same locality
- Sites B & C reside on separate servers on separate class C IP addresses, having no physical relationship
- Site A will likely reside on a completely separate server by virtue of being the linkee
- Requested anchor text will vary between targeted phrases
- Requested links will point to various parts of Site B

As Site B is not linking to Site C and thus not forming a chain, does this change how the search engines would treat the relationship? I'm assuming that if they can spot a relationship, it would be down to something like matching dates of when links were updated on the respective sites?

#20 Jill

Jill

    Recovering SEO

  • Admin
  • 32,926 posts

Posted 29 April 2009 - 05:36 PM

As I said a year and a half ago when this thread was new, just do trapezoidal linking matriflux. That's kind of what yours sounds like jsp1983.

#21 jsp1983

jsp1983

    HR 3

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 98 posts
  • Location:Blackpool, UK

Posted 29 April 2009 - 05:41 PM

QUOTE(Jill @ Apr 29 2009, 11:36 PM) View Post
As I said a year and a half ago when this thread was new, just do trapezoidal linking matriflux. That's kind of what yours sounds like jsp1983.


But what if these sites only support parabolic tetrafluxing?

#22 Jill

Jill

    Recovering SEO

  • Admin
  • 32,926 posts

Posted 29 April 2009 - 06:15 PM

That'll do just as well wink1.gif

#23 jsp1983

jsp1983

    HR 3

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 98 posts
  • Location:Blackpool, UK

Posted 29 April 2009 - 06:45 PM

Okay, joking aside, is there any merit to that idea? I appreciate that the traditional 3-way linking method previously discussed is open and shut, but I'd really like to know about this one. Anybody want to help with a n00b's sense of curiousity?

#24 Jill

Jill

    Recovering SEO

  • Admin
  • 32,926 posts

Posted 30 April 2009 - 07:56 AM

The question can't be answered since there's actually nothing wrong with traditional 1-1 reciprocal linking.

All links are good for you to have.

#25 1dmf

1dmf

    Keep Asking, Keep Questioning, Keep Learning

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,161 posts
  • Location:Worthing - England

Posted 30 April 2009 - 10:45 AM

I prefer Quantum Flux Cross Linking , it helps with the sub space pages and pulls all links into a simple quantum page singularity.

starwars.gif








0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

SPAM FREE FORUM!
 
If you are just registering to spam,
don't bother. You will be wasting your
time as your spam will never see the
light of day!