24 replies to this topic

[Randy]

Randy, sounds like you got far too many sites, PR , ranking and IBL's , wanna trade?

No.

FTR, my reference to Round Robin Linking is just Randy-speak for all of those 3-way, 4-way and 19-way linking schemes designed to fool the search engines. I use Round Robin because no matter where you start, if you follow the trail of birdseed far enough you'll end up back where you started.

[1dmf]

lol ok, ok, step away from the pitch fork! you devil!

I guessed it was more a Randy coloquism rather than an industry standardisation, but I like it, you should patent it and then sue everyone who uses the 'Round Robin Linking Matriflux Method' without prior consent!

[Randy]

There's only one problem with your suggestion 1dmf. And that's that I absolutely, positively detest lawyers. Really I do. And with good reason.

This personal aversion would throw a monkey wrench into the equation since I'd never sue because I never want to have to hire and pay a lawyer again in my life if I can keep from it.

[jsp1983]

How about 'almost' 3-way links?

How about this example:

Site A - the site from which a link is being solicited
Site B - the site for which the link is being requested
Site C - the site for which a link (and some content) is being offered to Site A

- All of the sites' content relate to the same industry and the same locality
- Sites B & C reside on separate servers on separate class C IP addresses, having no physical relationship
- Site A will likely reside on a completely separate server by virtue of being the linkee
- Requested anchor text will vary between targeted phrases
- Requested links will point to various parts of Site B

As Site B is not linking to Site C and thus not forming a chain, does this change how the search engines would treat the relationship? I'm assuming that if they can spot a relationship, it would be down to something like matching dates of when links were updated on the respective sites?

[Jill]

As I said a year and a half ago when this thread was new, just do trapezoidal linking matriflux. That's kind of what yours sounds like jsp1983.

[jsp1983]

As I said a year and a half ago when this thread was new, just do trapezoidal linking matriflux. That's kind of what yours sounds like jsp1983.

But what if these sites only support parabolic tetrafluxing?

[Jill]

That'll do just as well

[jsp1983]

Okay, joking aside, is there any merit to that idea? I appreciate that the traditional 3-way linking method previously discussed is open and shut, but I'd really like to know about this one. Anybody want to help with a n00b's sense of curiousity?

[Jill]

The question can't be answered since there's actually nothing wrong with traditional 1-1 reciprocal linking.

All links are good for you to have.

[1dmf]

I prefer Quantum Flux Cross Linking , it helps with the sub space pages and pulls all links into a simple quantum page singularity.