Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Subscribe to HRA Now!

 



Are you a Google Analytics enthusiast?

Share and download Custom Google Analytics Reports, dashboards and advanced segments--for FREE! 

 



 

 www.CustomReportSharing.com 

From the folks who brought you High Rankings!


Sponsored Content

 

 
 

Photo

Index.ext Question


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 Andy_Seo

Andy_Seo

    HR 4

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 237 posts
  • Location:Welwyn Garden City

Posted 11 April 2008 - 09:35 AM

Hello all.

I have a website that has a number of canonicalization issues - one of them being a .index.php and index.php?noflash indexed.

Now it is exactly the same content and my question is what affect will the restriction of /index.php?noflash have on the .index.php of the site? Will the robots still be able to crawl the root directory?

Cheers.

#2 Randy

Randy

    Convert Me!

  • Moderator
  • 17,540 posts

Posted 11 April 2008 - 04:54 PM

Google would see the distinction. I believe Yahoo would too. I've honestly not paid attention to MSN or any of the rest, but would assume they can handle the dynamic url in robots.txt.

In any case if the engine in question has your site indexed with just the base url with no index.php in there at all they should all see the difference. Watch it after you change it in different engines to make sure. It's been awhile since I've tested this sort of thing. That way if you need to change something for one engine or another you'll know it right away.

#3 Jill

Jill

    High Rankings Advisor

  • Admin
  • 32,317 posts

Posted 11 April 2008 - 10:24 PM

QUOTE
Now it is exactly the same content and my question is what affect will the restriction of /index.php?noflash have on the .index.php of the site? Will the robots still be able to crawl the root directory?


Excluding /index.php?noflash would have no effect on index.php. The search engines will only exclude the one URl you have listed there. That's exactly how you should d o it.

#4 Andy_Seo

Andy_Seo

    HR 4

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 237 posts
  • Location:Welwyn Garden City

Posted 13 April 2008 - 07:49 AM

Many thanks for you input guys. Your posts have confirmed my initial thoughts.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users