Are you a Google Analytics enthusiast?
More SEO Content
Best Way To Write Url With Seo In Mind
Posted 07 February 2008 - 12:13 PM
Thanks for the help!
Posted 07 February 2008 - 12:18 PM
I don't think it makes much difference TBH. If you concentrate more on the Titles (most importantly), heading and copy of each page, that is what tells the search engines about the content of the page.
Posted 07 February 2008 - 12:33 PM
One question, what do you mean by copy?
Posted 07 February 2008 - 01:17 PM
As to the main question, you probably won't want to start changing your url addresses. It's the single biggest mistake I see people make.
Not only will you not get any major benefit from loading up your urls with keywords, you're going to effectively make each of the search engines start all over again in spidering, indexing and ranking the pages that make up your site. Changing your structure in this way --especially for the reason you mentioned-- is simply a really bad idea. It'll cause you months of pain if you do it.
Posted 07 February 2008 - 07:40 PM
No, no, no! Don't do it!
Unless you're redesigning and have to change URLs anyway, it's just a silly waste of time to do it otherwise.
Posted 11 February 2008 - 10:46 AM
If I am understanding correct then you need to go for specialist
Posted 27 February 2009 - 01:40 PM
mystore dot com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=3&products_id=5
Would a static with keywords be better, with a 301 redirect to handle pages that are already indexed, like this:
mystore dot com/books/life_is_good
Posted 27 February 2009 - 01:58 PM
Posted 28 February 2009 - 03:37 AM
Just keep in mind that whenever you change the URL of your website just don't forget to regenerate sitemap.xml and submit it to server.
Posted 28 February 2009 - 09:06 AM
I beg to differ.
Have you ever actually tested this theory in a side-by-side test? I think you might be surprised by the outcome if you do.
Posted 06 March 2009 - 11:08 AM
Only advantage of rewriting them is that your keywords will show on the url, and when a person does a search for a keyword that is on your url as well as your title, and description, GYM will show those keywords in bold to the searcher, and the searcher will assume that since everything is in bold on that listing, that listing is his best or closest option to click on.
Posted 10 March 2009 - 01:05 AM
1. Static URLs typically rank better in search engines.
2. Search engines are known to index the content of dynamic pages much more slowly than that of static pages.
3. Static URLs look friendlier to end users.
Posted 10 March 2009 - 09:05 AM
3. Debatable, and depends upon personal choice. One can be just as user friendly as the other.
Posted 10 March 2009 - 09:28 AM
Posted 10 March 2009 - 09:39 AM
If you use SSI and set IIS to interpret HTML through the SSI processor, you tell me... is this a static or dynamic URL.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users