Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Subscribe to HRA Now!

 



SEO Class in Chicago, IL

Learn How To Optimize Your Website on July 26, 2013


Looking for personalized in-depth SEO training among your peers?



High Rankings is offering a 1-day customized SEO training class in Chicago. Class size is limited so please sign-up now if you want in!



 


Are you a Google Analytics enthusiast?

Share and download Custom Google Analytics Reports, dashboards and advanced segments--for FREE! 

 



 

 www.CustomReportSharing.com 

From the folks who brought you High Rankings!



Photo
- - - - -

Complete Site Redesign In Css


  • Please log in to reply
16 replies to this topic

#16 JohneeMac

JohneeMac

    HR 4

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 217 posts
  • Location:Scotland

Posted 25 October 2007 - 01:13 PM

QUOTE(chrishirst @ Oct 23 2007, 11:20 AM) View Post
Tables ARE a perfectly valid and acceptable design in the right place

only a overly pretentious designer/coder would insist on using divs & spans etc to layout a spreadsheet look for data.

Using tables to design a layout for a simple page is obviously a silly method BUT it is still a valid use of HTML, the CSS snobs & purists may frown on it but what has it got to do with them!!!!

I always maintain that the XHTML strict "willy wavers" are also wrong, unless they are using XML in the document.

The mantra should be use the right tool for the job at hand NOT "Thou shalt use div & spans for everything"


Nonsense! JM looks at date and maybe thinks hes warped back to 2000.


QUOTE(Jill @ Oct 23 2007, 01:50 PM) View Post
I don't really want to have this debate again as we've had it a number of times here, but your analogy just doesn't make any sense.

One thing works perfectly fine (tables for your layout) and provides exactly what you need to make your site look the way you want it. And the other doesn't (reciprocal links).

Why are tables bad again?


As you say other there is another thread about but quickly: Accessibility, Multiple Devices, Updatable are three quick words!


#17 Dimmerswitch

Dimmerswitch

    HR 3

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 72 posts
  • Location:Madison, Wisconsin

Posted 25 October 2007 - 01:52 PM

QUOTE(JohneeMac @ Oct 25 2007, 01:13 PM) View Post
QUOTE(chrishirst @ Oct 23 2007, 05:20 AM) View Post

Tables ARE a perfectly valid and acceptable design in the right place

only a overly pretentious designer/coder would insist on using divs & spans etc to layout a spreadsheet look for data.

Using tables to design a layout for a simple page is obviously a silly method BUT it is still a valid use of HTML, the CSS snobs & purists may frown on it but what has it got to do with them!!!!

I always maintain that the XHTML strict "willy wavers" are also wrong, unless they are using XML in the document.

The mantra should be use the right tool for the job at hand NOT "Thou shalt use div & spans for everything"
Nonsense! JM looks at date and maybe thinks hes warped back to 2000.


If you re-read Chris's post I think you'll see you've overreacted.

Johnee, surely you're not arguing that <div> and <span> elements should be used for tabular information like spreadsheets?

It's good, healthy, and (I feel) important to write markup which seperates structure from presentation. It's also cool to be enthusiastic about web standards. It's inaccurate to say that tables are inherently invalid though - even in XHTML strict.

I don't use tables for layout in my work, and I find it a less-natural way to approach page layout now, but I don't think that the act of writing a <table> tag to solve a layout problem makes people unclean or polluted somehow (for me, that's reserved for folks who continue to sprinkle <font> tags all over their markup).






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users