Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Subscribe to HRA Now!

 



Are you a Google Analytics enthusiast?

Share and download Custom Google Analytics Reports, dashboards and advanced segments--for FREE! 

 



 

 www.CustomReportSharing.com 

From the folks who brought you High Rankings!


Sponsored Content

 

 
 

Photo

Review Of New Energy Web Site


  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

#1 ScottSalwolke

ScottSalwolke

    Scott Salwolke

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 405 posts
  • Location:Dubuque, IA

Posted 14 October 2007 - 02:21 PM

http://www.newenergyinc.com

General
Is this site completed or under construction? Yes, the site has been up for a while with this design.

If completed:
How long has the site been up? The site has been up for quite a few years.

SEO
Do you have incoming links? Yes, a few hundred, although I'm adding more each day.

What keywords are you targeting? Wood burning fireplaces, gas stoves, fireplace inserts

Do you want your code reviewed for errors or improvements? Yes

Marketing
Who is your target audience? Homeowners looking for fireplaces or other hearth products.

The more you tell us about your target audience, the better. We don't know them- you do!

Why is your site different from sites selling/offering similar info/goods/services? Why will someone want to do business you?

How important is usability? Important, but

What is the purpose of the site? (inform, sell, online community, support B&M business, contact info only, etc) Sell products online. Most interested buyers contact their sales department when ready to make a purchase.

Design
Do you want design suggestions? Yes, if you discover problems that could be creating problems with spiders.

This site has been up for a while with this design. It’s a client I’m supplying content for on their product pages. There is plans to put up a new design, but not for a while.

The main problem with this site is that Google isn’t updating their pages. Most of the pages haven’t been revisited since July, including most of the pages I’ve provided copy for. I’m looking for people to see if they see something that is preventing the spiders from accessing all the pages. It has a sitemap.xml that Google has verified and a regular sitemap as well. When the pages are indexed they rank well for their keyword phrases.

#2 Jill

Jill

    High Rankings Advisor

  • Admin
  • 32,311 posts

Posted 14 October 2007 - 05:16 PM

Google has indexed 361 pages. Are there more than that?

If not, the problem is that the javascript mouseover menu at the top is invisible to search engines. Put the page URLs into a noscript tag and that should solve the problem.

#3 ScottSalwolke

ScottSalwolke

    Scott Salwolke

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 405 posts
  • Location:Dubuque, IA

Posted 14 October 2007 - 09:42 PM

Jill, I thought from the beginning this was a problem, especially because this type adds so much code to each page. Yet, most of the new pages are included in links at the bottom of the page. And it does seem as if most of the pages are indexed by Google. But if you go to site:www.newenergyinc.com in Google, of the first ten pages listed only four have been spidered recently. The rest have had new content added to them two months ago, including new titles, but these aren't updated.

#4 Jill

Jill

    High Rankings Advisor

  • Admin
  • 32,311 posts

Posted 14 October 2007 - 11:10 PM

Usually that's a symptom of Google not feeling they are very important. You probably need some sort of full out linking campaign.

But it could be your internal linking which is causing it as well. Pages linked only from a footer seem to be discounted somewhat by Google as people put their doorway page links there.

#5 ScottSalwolke

ScottSalwolke

    Scott Salwolke

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 405 posts
  • Location:Dubuque, IA

Posted 15 October 2007 - 03:55 PM

QUOTE(Jill @ Oct 14 2007, 11:10 PM) View Post
You probably need some sort of full out linking campaign.

Pages linked only from a footer seem to be discounted somewhat by Google as people put their doorway page links there.


Jill, I've been developing new links to the site, thinking this would help. And I had some concerns about the links being at the bottom. It's this reason we wen't with the sitemaps. But it seems as if they're finding the pages. Just not returning to them on a regular basis.

#6 Jill

Jill

    High Rankings Advisor

  • Admin
  • 32,311 posts

Posted 15 October 2007 - 06:28 PM

QUOTE
But it seems as if they're finding the pages. Just not returning to them on a regular basis.


Right, because they don't believe they're important enough to come back to on a regular basis. You've told them that because they believe they're only in the footer.

Why not do the noscript thing so that they can see your actual main navigation menu?

#7 nethy

nethy

    HR 6

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 974 posts

Posted 15 October 2007 - 09:32 PM

QUOTE
Why not do the noscript thing so that they can see your actual main navigation menu?


Thinking less can be good. If they see the full navigation then they see how you prioritise pages. As long as there is no discrepency between what pages you want users to go to & what pages you want SERPs to list, just showing engines your regular navigation lets them know how you prioritse your pages (main pages, sub pages, pages that are not linked to from navigation, pages that are linked to multiple times in navigation...).

#8 ScottSalwolke

ScottSalwolke

    Scott Salwolke

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 405 posts
  • Location:Dubuque, IA

Posted 16 October 2007 - 07:51 PM

QUOTE(Jill @ Oct 15 2007, 06:28 PM) View Post
Why not do the noscript thing so that they can see your actual main navigation menu?


Jill so I'd have him put this around code that doesn't relate to the copy or the bottom links?

#9 Jill

Jill

    High Rankings Advisor

  • Admin
  • 32,311 posts

Posted 16 October 2007 - 10:28 PM

No. You'd take the links that are in your javascript menu and place them within <noscript>tags</noscript>. See the source code of the main pages of the current highrankings.com site for an example of how to do it.

#10 ScottSalwolke

ScottSalwolke

    Scott Salwolke

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 405 posts
  • Location:Dubuque, IA

Posted 17 October 2007 - 07:29 PM

I'll give that a try.

#11 ScottSalwolke

ScottSalwolke

    Scott Salwolke

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 405 posts
  • Location:Dubuque, IA

Posted 31 October 2007 - 09:41 PM

QUOTE(Jill @ Oct 16 2007, 10:28 PM) View Post
You'd take the links that are in your javascript menu and place them within <noscript>tags</noscript>. See the source code of the main pages of the current highrankings.com site for an example of how to do it.


Jill, I had the site owner incorporate this code, but he wasn't sure where the menu ended. When he used the closing noscript tag (</noscript>) it ended up making everything below the tag as invisible on the page. The code for this page is just so screwed up it's hard to find where things begin and where things end.

#12 Jill

Jill

    High Rankings Advisor

  • Admin
  • 32,311 posts

Posted 31 October 2007 - 10:36 PM

Sounds like you need a new developer.

#13 ceuyan

ceuyan

    HR 2

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 23 posts

Posted 06 August 2008 - 05:09 PM

i dont want to say anything to harsh to get me band or hated but the only thing i can suggest is to take a look at this site

woodburnerwarehouse.co.uk




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users