Seems to be simply an outlet for SEO bloggers to promote SEO bloggers, linkbait titles to posts with little if any substance that then get "sphinned" up.
"SEO friendly" social media?
No thanks....
Subscribe to HRA Now!
Are you a Google Analytics enthusiast?
Share and download Custom Google Analytics Reports, dashboards and advanced segments--for FREE!
www.CustomReportSharing.com
From the folks who brought you High Rankings!
More SEO Content
International SEM | Social Media | Search Friendly Design | SEO | Paid Search / PPC | Seminars | Forum Threads | Q&A | Copywriting | Keyword Research | Web Analytics / Conversions | Blogging | Dynamic Sites | Linking | SEO Services | Site Architecture | Search Engine Spam | Wrap-ups | Business Issues | HRA Questions | Online Courses
Sponsored Content
Sphinning Out Of Control?
Started by
glengara
, Oct 04 2007 05:49 PM
2 replies to this topic
#2
Jill
-
- Admin
-
- 32,325 posts
High Rankings Advisor
Posted 04 October 2007 - 06:25 PM
I dunno, glengara. I've been pleasantly surprised with Sphinn so far. And most of the posts that go Hot do seem to be generally pretty good. They've certainly got their work cut out for them as the membership increases, and it will be interesting to see how it goes.
If anyone's interested, I wrote up my first few weeks as a Sphinn user a little while back.
If anyone's interested, I wrote up my first few weeks as a Sphinn user a little while back.
#3
roxyyo
-
- Active Members
-
- 345 posts
Token Wheelchair Chick
- Location:Vancouver, BC
Posted 05 October 2007 - 11:32 PM
I think Sphinn's doing a great job as a niche site for us SEO/Internet marketing types. Of course, the "linkerati" of the industry are going to have an easier time getting stories Sphunn and voted up. Just makes the up-and-comers work harder on cranking out good content and building relationships in the community. Personally I dont have the patience to wait for SEO stories to make it on Digg. Digg's a bit too geeky even for me, ha ha.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
