Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Subscribe to HRA Now!

 



SEO Class in Chicago, IL

Learn How To Optimize Your Website on July 26, 2013


Looking for personalized in-depth SEO training among your peers?



High Rankings is offering a 1-day customized SEO training class in Chicago. Class size is limited so please sign-up now if you want in!



 


Are you a Google Analytics enthusiast?

Share and download Custom Google Analytics Reports, dashboards and advanced segments--for FREE! 

 



 

 www.CustomReportSharing.com 

From the folks who brought you High Rankings!



Photo

Url's Restricted By Robots.txt


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 Comtrad

Comtrad

    HR 4

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 130 posts
  • Location:My Computer

Posted 14 September 2007 - 09:19 AM

I am looking in google webmasters and there are over 1k links restricted by the robots.txt. I understand why they would be restricted, which is because we have it so it can't index User ID sessions. However every link that is restricted has a user ID that we do not have on our site.

http://example.com/M...?UserID=2667723 URL restricted by robots.txt [?] Sep 10, 2007
http://example.com/M...?UserID=2667724 URL restricted by robots.txt [?] Sep 10, 2007
http://example.com/M...?UserID=2667725 URL restricted by robots.txt [?] Sep 10, 2007
http://example.com/M...?UserID=2667726 URL restricted by robots.txt [?] Sep 10, 2007
http://example.com/M...?UserID=2667727 URL restricted by robots.txt [?] Sep 10, 2007
http://example.com/M...?UserID=2667728 URL restricted by robots.txt [?] Sep 7, 2007

Those 6 User ID's are not registered on our site. However it shows up usually in that order with each link for over 1k links being restricted. Can google make their own ID's?

Anyone seen this before?

This is our robots.txt

CODE
User-agent:*
Disallow: /*?
Disallow: /sendlink.aspx


#2 Randy

Randy

    Convert Me!

  • Moderator
  • 17,540 posts

Posted 15 September 2007 - 06:10 AM

QUOTE
Can google make their own ID's?


Can they? Sure, they could. But they don't as far as I know.

QUOTE
Anyone seen this before?


Yup, sure have. In the vast majority of cases it was just referrer spam, where someone adds something to your url to get it to show up in your stats on the hope that

1) You'll click through to their site to see what they're doing, bringing them (very unqualified) traffic;

2) Your stats are not protected and get spidered by the search engines, which can end up giving them a link that doesn't really appear on your site at all.

#3 Comtrad

Comtrad

    HR 4

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 130 posts
  • Location:My Computer

Posted 15 September 2007 - 08:15 AM

QUOTE(Randy @ Sep 15 2007, 06:10 AM) View Post
Can they? Sure, they could. But they don't as far as I know.
Yup, sure have. In the vast majority of cases it was just referrer spam, where someone adds something to your url to get it to show up in your stats on the hope that

1) You'll click through to their site to see what they're doing, bringing them (very unqualified) traffic;

2) Your stats are not protected and get spidered by the search engines, which can end up giving them a link that doesn't really appear on your site at all.

How would I check if my stats are protected or not, and go about fixing it?

#4 Randy

Randy

    Convert Me!

  • Moderator
  • 17,540 posts

Posted 16 September 2007 - 06:19 AM

Easy to check. When you go to your Stats page does it ask you for a username and password?

If the server requires a User/Password they're protected. If not, they're not.

How to fix it depends upon what type of server you're on, what control panel is installed, your server permissions, etc. Many control panels these days give you an easy way to password protect directories, so that would be the first place to start. Or if you're on a *nix system you could always do it manually by uploading .htaccess and .htpasswd files.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users