Cheers:
SEO Class in Chicago, IL
Learn How To Optimize Your Website on July 26, 2013
High Rankings is offering a 1-day customized SEO training class in Chicago. Class size is limited so please sign-up now if you want in!
Are you a Google Analytics enthusiast?
Share and download Custom Google Analytics Reports, dashboards and advanced segments--for FREE!

www.CustomReportSharing.com
From the folks who brought you High Rankings!
More SEO Content
Trusted Feed
#1
Posted 11 August 2003 - 02:07 AM
Cheers:
#2
Posted 11 August 2003 - 04:25 AM
Remember that Trusted Feed partners are there to submit a feed. They will check it is valid (URLs and format) - but will not optimise the feed (normally) unless they are paid extra to do so. This is rather like other forms of PFI - where a page is submitted but ranking is dependent on on-page optimisation which you have to do yourself.
With a Feed - all is really dependent on the way the feed is optimised. The better it is done, the better you will rank.
I spend a lot of time re-doing feeds which have been submitted via direct partners in order to make them work better for the client. Frankly, the standard of feed data submitted is normally pretty poor.
Well optimised, Trusted Feeds can work exceptionally well (they can even work quite well when the data is incorrectly laid out).
So, in my case I don't really rely on the services provided by the Feed partner apart from submission services.
Personally speaking, I use PositionTech as they have relationships with all the main engines that accept feeds - INK, ATW, AV and AJ.
#3
Posted 11 August 2003 - 06:53 PM
Have you used any of the other trusted feed partners, or do you know much about any of them? Being down in Australia, it is hard to just pick up the phone to find out what each one is like.
Has anyone else used any of the other partners?
Cheers for the help
#4
Posted 12 August 2003 - 11:32 AM
I guess if you have decent terms, at a low enough CPC you should be OK.
MakeMeTop - what's your opinion on them (you are about the only person I've seen who seems to have used them a lot) Vs. PPC or PI ???
Thx
#5
Posted 12 August 2003 - 02:44 PM
There are a couple of major problems with large database sites:
i) Getting stuff indexed.
ii) Working out what pages are going to receive the clicks!
The beauty of Trusted Feeds are that you can negotiate a flat CPC rate and not pay for submission. Like Overture, you only pay when someone clicks through - but unlike Overture you have a fixed price. So a feed can simply address problem #1.
Now, one would be silly to pay hundreds/thousands of $ per year in clicks to an individual page, when you could pay a few dollars for unlimited clicks for a year! So monitoring the feed will allow you to pull URLs that are getting multiple clicks and placing the URL (suitably optimised) in to standard flat-rate PFI.
Alternatively, you may identify particular terms/pages where bidding on Overture may be less than your cost on the feed and decide to go that route.
All-in-all though, Trusted Feeds are an excellent way of getting complex sites indexed properly without the client having to redesign their sites for search engines. Even better, feeds can really work well.
Traffic levels can be amazing when you have many thousands of URLs in a feed.
#6
Posted 12 August 2003 - 03:16 PM
Now, one would be silly to pay hundreds/thousands of $ per year in clicks to an individual page, when you could pay a few dollars for unlimited clicks for a year! So monitoring the feed will allow you to pull URLs that are getting multiple clicks and placing the URL (suitably optimised) in to standard flat-rate PFI.
Ohhh...that's a good strategy! Very smart, Barry. (No surprise there.
J
#7
Posted 13 August 2003 - 08:22 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









