It's been too long in coming.
Are you a Google Analytics enthusiast?
Share and download Custom Google Analytics Reports, dashboards and advanced segments--for FREE!

www.CustomReportSharing.com
From the folks who brought you High Rankings!
More SEO Content
International SEM | Social Media | Search Friendly Design | SEO | Paid Search / PPC | Seminars | Forum Threads | Q&A | Copywriting | Keyword Research | Web Analytics / Conversions | Blogging | Dynamic Sites | Linking | SEO Services | Site Architecture | Search Engine Spam | Wrap-ups | Business Issues | HRA Questions | Online Courses
The End Of Mfa Sites?
Started by
Scottie
, May 19 2007 08:51 PM
6 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 19 May 2007 - 08:51 PM
Jensense has a post about the number of MFA and arbitrage sites getting AdSense account disabling emails.
It's been too long in coming.
It's been too long in coming.
#2
Posted 19 May 2007 - 11:01 PM
I hope it's true, but the fact that G makes millions off of these sites makes me wonder if it could ever happen.
#3
Posted 20 May 2007 - 02:15 AM
QUOTE
G makes millions off of these sites
But they lose millions because advertisers lower their content network bids to compensate for click crap. This is the right business decision.
#4
Posted 20 May 2007 - 03:01 AM
I think the right move is to segregate the sites. Having to bid on ALL content sites or manually remove some places too much of the burden on the advertisers. Google should step up and do SOME of that work for us, by providing levels to aim at: Tier one (NY Times), Tier two (trusted sites that Google editorial approves) and The Muck (Everything else). That way advertisers could target the traffic that works, and bid accordingly.
#5
Posted 21 May 2007 - 02:18 AM
QUOTE
Google should step up and do SOME of that work for us, by providing levels to aim at: Tier one (NY Times), Tier two (trusted sites that Google editorial approves) and The Muck (Everything else).
I would agree with this wholeheartedly projectphp - I will either turn off content network all together because of the quality of the clicks, or certainly put them down to the lowest possble $ per click.
But as you say, there are some good content network sites out there and you would think this would be easy enough for Google to do with the whole TrustRank issue.
#6
Posted 21 May 2007 - 08:35 AM
Whatever the rights and wrongs of the situation, I think it's refreshing to see a company thinking long term and not just about this year's bottom line.
#7
Posted 21 May 2007 - 10:37 AM
there are some good content network sites out there
That's why I always recommend other non-Google PPC networks. They offer that which Google lacks. I guess its my way of spreading my "eggs" around and not putting them all in the Google basket.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









