Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Subscribe to HRA Now!

 



Are you a Google Analytics enthusiast?

Share and download Custom Google Analytics Reports, dashboards and advanced segments--for FREE! 

 



 

 www.CustomReportSharing.com 

From the folks who brought you High Rankings!


Sponsored Content

 

 
 

Photo

The End Of Mfa Sites?


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 Scottie

Scottie

    Psycho Mom

  • Admin
  • 6,294 posts
  • Location:Columbia, SC

Posted 19 May 2007 - 08:51 PM

Jensense has a post about the number of MFA and arbitrage sites getting AdSense account disabling emails.

It's been too long in coming. appl.gif

#2 qwerty

qwerty

    HR 10

  • Moderator
  • 8,295 posts
  • Location:Somerville, MA

Posted 19 May 2007 - 11:01 PM

I hope it's true, but the fact that G makes millions off of these sites makes me wonder if it could ever happen.

#3 jehochman

jehochman

    Jonathan Hochman

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,555 posts
  • Location:Connecticut - Land of Steady Habits

Posted 20 May 2007 - 02:15 AM

QUOTE
G makes millions off of these sites


But they lose millions because advertisers lower their content network bids to compensate for click crap. This is the right business decision.

#4 projectphp

projectphp

    Lost in Translation

  • Moderator
  • 2,203 posts
  • Location:Sydney Australia

Posted 20 May 2007 - 03:01 AM

I think the right move is to segregate the sites. Having to bid on ALL content sites or manually remove some places too much of the burden on the advertisers. Google should step up and do SOME of that work for us, by providing levels to aim at: Tier one (NY Times), Tier two (trusted sites that Google editorial approves) and The Muck (Everything else). That way advertisers could target the traffic that works, and bid accordingly.

#5 SmellieNellie

SmellieNellie

    HR 6

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 559 posts
  • Location:Wrexham, North Wales

Posted 21 May 2007 - 02:18 AM

QUOTE
Google should step up and do SOME of that work for us, by providing levels to aim at: Tier one (NY Times), Tier two (trusted sites that Google editorial approves) and The Muck (Everything else).


I would agree with this wholeheartedly projectphp - I will either turn off content network all together because of the quality of the clicks, or certainly put them down to the lowest possble $ per click.

But as you say, there are some good content network sites out there and you would think this would be easy enough for Google to do with the whole TrustRank issue.

#6 rolf

rolf

    HR 6

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 675 posts
  • Location:Suffolk UK

Posted 21 May 2007 - 08:35 AM

Whatever the rights and wrongs of the situation, I think it's refreshing to see a company thinking long term and not just about this year's bottom line.

#7 smc_online

smc_online

    HR 4

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 277 posts
  • Location:Tampa, Florida

Posted 21 May 2007 - 10:37 AM

QUOTE(SmellieNellie @ May 21 2007, 03:18 AM) View Post
there are some good content network sites out there


That's why I always recommend other non-Google PPC networks. They offer that which Google lacks. I guess its my way of spreading my "eggs" around and not putting them all in the Google basket.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users