Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Subscribe to HRA Now!

 



Are you a Google Analytics enthusiast?

Share and download Custom Google Analytics Reports, dashboards and advanced segments--for FREE! 

 



 

 www.CustomReportSharing.com 

From the folks who brought you High Rankings!


Sponsored Content

 

 
 

Photo

Google Adwords


  • Please log in to reply
15 replies to this topic

#1 bims

bims

    HR 4

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 110 posts
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 15 May 2007 - 05:30 PM

Hi,

Is it necessary to run a PPC campaign if you rank well for terms that you're targetting? What would be the reasons for doing this?

Thanks in advance

#2 seadog

seadog

    HR 3

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 88 posts

Posted 15 May 2007 - 05:42 PM

QUOTE(bims @ May 15 2007, 04:30 PM) View Post
Hi,

Is it necessary to run a PPC campaign if you rank well for terms that you're targetting? What would be the reasons for doing this?

Thanks in advance


Well if you are on a page two times vs once you statistically stand a better chance of attracting a click. In addition depending on where you rank both (organically and paid), you could have ads in very different portions of the page.

Measure the ROI on the PPC campaign and if it meets your goals (or even average it all together) then keep it running.

#3 Jill

Jill

    High Rankings Advisor

  • Admin
  • 32,311 posts

Posted 15 May 2007 - 06:11 PM

QUOTE
Is it necessary to run a PPC campaign if you rank well for terms that you're targetting? What would be the reasons for doing this?


If it makes you more money than it costs you, then I'd say it's worth it.

If it doesn't, it's not.

#4 bims

bims

    HR 4

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 110 posts
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 16 May 2007 - 02:57 AM

Thanks guys. I guess your ad can also be seen on third party pages which is also a good thing.


#5 torka

torka

    Vintage Babe

  • Moderator
  • 4,392 posts
  • Location:Triangle area, NC, USA, Earth (usually)

Posted 16 May 2007 - 09:27 AM

May or may not be, depending on your goals for the ads.

As Jill said, if the ROI is positive, then it's probably a good thing to continue to run the ads, because you'll be making more profits with them than you would without them.

If the ROI is neutral or negative, on the other hand, you need to decide based on what your purpose is in running the ads.

If you simply want your name to be seen in as many (possibly) relevant places as possible and cost is not a factor, then, well, it doesn't matter if the ads make a profit, so, sure, let 'em run everywhere.

If, however, you're looking to make a direct profit from these ads, then negative ROI is bad. Either find and specify third party sites that return positive ROI for your ads, or disable the third-party site option entirely.

--Torka mf_prop.gif

#6 bims

bims

    HR 4

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 110 posts
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 16 May 2007 - 11:27 AM

Makes perfect sense. How long would you trial it for? Is a week enough time to decide?


#7 BlueSky

BlueSky

    HR 4

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 163 posts
  • Location:Medway, MA

Posted 16 May 2007 - 12:51 PM

QUOTE(bims @ May 16 2007, 12:27 PM) View Post
Makes perfect sense. How long would you trial it for? Is a week enough time to decide?


Maybe, maybe not. If you get lucky, it might be a case of setting it up and all is good. If it requires fine tuning, expect more than a week:

1. Put a conversion tracking system in place (e.g. Analytics conversion tracking).
2. Research keywords & ad text.
3. Start up initial campaign, and wait for sufficient stats to build up.
4. Evaluate performance of keywords, adjust bidding.
5. Evaluate performance of ads, split testing, re-test, re-group, landing page testing, and so on.
6. Repeat steps 4 & 5 until your key performance indicators are met.
7. Decide if it is worthwhile.
8. Keep on doing steps 4 & 5 to adjust to the ever changing market.

If you're lucky, only steps 1 & 2 would apply. But I would continue to optimize the campaign anyway, to keep costs under control.

#8 Ignoramus

Ignoramus

    HR 4

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 163 posts

Posted 16 May 2007 - 04:37 PM

QUOTE(bims @ May 15 2007, 11:30 PM) View Post
Hi,

Is it necessary to run a PPC campaign if you rank well for terms that you're targetting? What would be the reasons for doing this?

Thanks in advance


As people have said - if the ROI on your PPC campaign is acceptable, why stop ?

Another factor. You can't bet your business on organic rankings. They can change overnight. Sure, if you drop out of the listings you can re-activate PPC but it can be expensive if you have lost your history.

IMHO the ideal situation is to have a PPC advert 'above the line' plus an organic listing on the first page.

#9 abra4magic.com

abra4magic.com

    HR 1

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts

Posted 16 May 2007 - 06:18 PM

Another important thing to consider: How many clicked on your PPC ad but would have clicked on your free organic listing if your PPC ad wasn't there?

You'd need to check your anayltics with both running as well as only your organic result. Once you determine how much extra you're paying and add that in to your cost you can figure if your net profit is better with or without both.

#10 LibbyLu

LibbyLu

    HR 3

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 67 posts
  • Location:Chicago

Posted 16 May 2007 - 06:22 PM

Another thing to consider is what page of your site are you ranking for organically? If it's not a targeted page, then you are better off continuing with AdWords (as long as you're making money off it of course whitehat.gif ).

#11 cline

cline

    HR 6

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 588 posts
  • Location:Massachusetts

Posted 16 May 2007 - 08:21 PM

If you don't take that AdWords spot, a competitor will.

When users see you listed in both the organic and sponsored results, they'll infer that your site must be especially highly relevant for them, increasing CTR for both listings.

#12 jehochman

jehochman

    Jonathan Hochman

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,555 posts
  • Location:Connecticut - Land of Steady Habits

Posted 16 May 2007 - 09:13 PM

If you choose your terms carefully and lower your bids enough, you will almost always make money if you have a good website, and you are making a good offer to your prospective clients. (If your site stinks, or your offer isn't compelling, then nothing will work.)

#13 Eschtruth Harrison

Eschtruth Harrison

    HR 3

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 53 posts
  • Location:Medford, Oregon USA

Posted 17 May 2007 - 12:00 PM

Don't make the assumption that people know the difference between an ad and the natural results. In many cases they will just click on the first thing that seems relevant to them. So even if you have a high natural listing (say position 5) but there are 2 sponsored results on top, you are effectively in the number 7 position visually. People may not look that far down the page.

#14 Darryl Payne

Darryl Payne

    HR 2

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 10 posts

Posted 22 May 2007 - 09:09 AM

I believe that it is important for some of your more competitive keywords, to still run a PPC campaign. Some people see the sponsored links as ads and some don't. Some people will trust paid ads over natural search. On the other hand, some people will never click on a paid ad. So it is important to make use of both when it is cost effective.

#15 jammin' Jake

jammin' Jake

    HR 2

  • Active Members
  • PipPip
  • 37 posts

Posted 25 June 2007 - 05:19 PM

Anybody come across any studies or statistics as to a searchers propensity to click an organic listing versus a pay per click listing? I've done a fair bit of research, but haven't had much success. Thanks in advance for any help!




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users