Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Subscribe to HRA Now!

 



SEO Class in Chicago, IL

Learn How To Optimize Your Website on July 26, 2013


Looking for personalized in-depth SEO training among your peers?



High Rankings is offering a 1-day customized SEO training class in Chicago. Class size is limited so please sign-up now if you want in!



 


Are you a Google Analytics enthusiast?

Share and download Custom Google Analytics Reports, dashboards and advanced segments--for FREE! 

 



 

 www.CustomReportSharing.com 

From the folks who brought you High Rankings!



Photo
- - - - -

Site Recode


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 jamie_g

jamie_g

    HR 2

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 14 posts
  • Location:Canada, Nova Scotia

Posted 02 January 2007 - 09:26 AM

Hi gang,

I'm preparing a recode for an established site that has consistent top 10 rankings. The revised site design will remain the same but we are breaking the site up into include files and coding for XHTML/CSS approach (the structure will change as well).

My action list only thus far only consists of one item:

1. Map out all current URLs (ranked or not - the site is smaller 300 pages) and set-up 301 redirects

The new coded version will also take advantage of a revised document structure (headings, p & lists - the old site had these but the revised will be more consistent).

I feel like I'm missing items for my action list?

Cheers, Jamie

** There may be other items that I have considered but listed)

#2 Randy

Randy

    Convert Me!

  • Moderator
  • 17,540 posts

Posted 02 January 2007 - 09:34 AM

If at all possible you'll want to keep the same page filenames Jamie. Not with the includes, but with the URI's the engines actually see and have indexed.

301's can help if there is an absolute need to change the structure completely, but expect at 4-6 month period for the engines to catch up with the changes if you end up changing all of the filenames.

Changing the underlying code that delivers the page usually doesn't have any negative effect. Changing the words on the pages will have some effect. Changing the filenames/structure will often have a rather drastic negative effect in at least the short term.

#3 jamie_g

jamie_g

    HR 2

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 14 posts
  • Location:Canada, Nova Scotia

Posted 02 January 2007 - 09:54 AM

Hi Randy, thanks for your quick response.

We are planning on reworking the site structure to incorporate shorter/keyword rich URLs (the non-targeted ones will stay the same):

Stay the same
www.mydomain.com/about/

Revised - From
www.mydomain.com/section/product/product-sub-category/product-name/details.html

To
www.mydomain.com/product/product-name/

A large chunk of the site is being move over to a database and were are planning on URL rewriting to handle the Search Engine friendly URLs

On this project the SEO has been done by someone else in my office (includes revised: page copy, title tags, image naming, etc.).

Is this not the best approach to take? I was expecting the wait for the engines to pick up the changes - am I missing anything else?

Thanks again,

Jamie

#4 Jill

Jill

    High Rankings Advisor

  • Admin
  • 32,326 posts

Posted 02 January 2007 - 10:18 AM

QUOTE
We are planning on reworking the site structure to incorporate shorter/keyword rich URLs (the non-targeted ones will stay the same):


I wouldn't do that if I were you. It's not going to be worth the lost rankings for all those months. We have a bunch of other threads on this topic you might want to look at.

#5 jamie_g

jamie_g

    HR 2

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 14 posts
  • Location:Canada, Nova Scotia

Posted 02 January 2007 - 10:28 AM

Hi Jill,

I'll have a read of these other resources and post any additional questions.

Thanks again,

Jamie




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users