SEO Class in Chicago, IL
Are you a Google Analytics enthusiast?
More SEO Content
H1 Hidden In Comment Tag
Posted 23 October 2006 - 04:24 PM
Posted 25 October 2006 - 05:45 AM
My checkbook is all bandaged up and limping from over a year's worth of your "extra- special, extra-costly" services
Posted 25 October 2006 - 08:59 AM
Posted 25 October 2006 - 11:32 AM
You know what? There should be a word for that kind of thing - useless attempts to spam or affect the search engines.
When I first started out in SEO, I often called pretty much anything distasteful "spam". Since then, I've learned a lot and have refined my thoughts on the subject.
Some things I used to think were spam now often are not (just silly), and others that I didn't even notice I now consider to be spam. My personal definition has also changed, as well.
I agree that if it has no hope of affecting your rankings, it should not be considered spam. Spam should be reserved for things that can affect your rankings, but should not.
I propose a new name for lame attempts to spam that don't work and serve mostly to show how clueless or desperate the author is.
Some ideas (mostly related to merging "lame" and "spam" or other terms):
Posted 25 October 2006 - 07:16 PM
That's the sound your rankings make when they hit the floor as a result of your lame attempts at spam!
Posted 25 October 2006 - 09:42 PM
No, but there's the irony. Your rankings won't do anything.
Posted 26 October 2006 - 06:36 AM
But if that's the extent of your SEO efforts...?
Posted 26 October 2006 - 06:55 AM
I believe that this is a genuine 'spam recipe'
And one could say that someone using the technique is frittering away their time/effort.
Posted 26 October 2006 - 10:01 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users