Are you a Google Analytics enthusiast?
Share and download Custom Google Analytics Reports, dashboards and advanced segments--for FREE!

www.CustomReportSharing.com
From the folks who brought you High Rankings!
More SEO Content
What Is Fact And Fiction For Good Rankings?
#1
Posted 04 September 2006 - 12:58 PM
1. Having a site map will increase visiblity?
2. Having a Google Site map (www.google.com/webmasters/sitemaps/siteoverview) will increase visiblity?
3. Using the H1 tag will increase visibility?
4. I should have a site made just for Google and one just for Yahoo for good visibility?
5. Any resubmission to any of the search engine robots will get them to reindex your site again sooner.
Now a few general questions.
1. Does any of the search engine robots search exteral Java, CSS files?
2. What is a good length for a site title?
3. Does any any META information help improve rankings?
4. Should I have lots of content on the front page of the site, more then I would normally have that is built with good amount of key phrases?
5. Having to many outward links on a site would hurt rankings?
6. It is best to have the top keyphrases I need placement for in the title, meta tags, h1 tag, body copy, alt tags and as many places as possible? Would this not be spaming the search engines?
I hope this list will help everyone and I will compile an update message when this thread closes.
#2
Posted 04 September 2006 - 01:11 PM
#3
Posted 04 September 2006 - 01:17 PM
#4
Posted 04 September 2006 - 01:22 PM
1. Does any of the search engine robots search exteral Java, CSS files?
They certainly call themwhile spidering but what they do with them is another matter.
2. What is a good length for a site title?Whatever makes sense.
There is a myth about truncation, but it is the browsers that truncate, not the search engines. The title should describe the page.
3. Does any any META information help improve rankings?
Define meta? Description is used by the search engines, as to how much weight is on it who knows
4. Should I have lots of content on the front page of the site, more then I would normally have that is built with good amount of key phrases?
You should design your site to be perfect for the visitor, 99:100 times this is what the spiders want also. you should only be targeting 1 or 2 phrases per page anyhow so the need for extra junk shouldn't come into it. Focus on conversions.
5. Having to many outward links on a site would hurt rankings?
Rubbish, outbound links help place your site in the grand scheme of things. But linking to any old rubbish will certainly not help your cause.
6. It is best to have the top keyphrases I need placement for in the title, meta tags, h1 tag, body copy, alt tags and as many places as possible? Would this not be spaming the search engines?
Cramming your keywords everywhere certainly is spammy. use the alt tag for what it is meant to be used for, and header tags the same.
#5
Posted 04 September 2006 - 01:25 PM
what we do is get two frogs, put them on a table and watch which way they jump
#6
Posted 04 September 2006 - 01:26 PM
I just know.
#7
Posted 04 September 2006 - 01:56 PM
#8
Posted 04 September 2006 - 02:06 PM
There is a myth about truncation, but it is the browsers that truncate, not the search engines. The title should describe the page.
A recent Microsoft research paper exploring identification of web spam by looking at content of pages noted that, while looking at a large body of documents pulled from the web, all of the ones with page titles that were longer than 24 words long were spam. Is it a heuristic that they will adapt or use to identify web spam? Who knows? But, I couldn't see making page titles that long anyway.
Page titles are meant to describe the content on a page, and show up visibly in a few places if you are fortunate:
1. At the top of a browser window
2. In search results
3. Possibly as the anchor text for your page when others link to it.
Search engines do truncate the length of page titles that they display in search results. If part of your aim with a page title is to persuade people to click on the link in those results, and it probably should be, then try not to make the title too much longer than around 6o or so characters. A search engine might index more of the title than shows in results, but I think you lose something by making a title so long - people don't see their keywords reflected in those page titles.
#9
Posted 04 September 2006 - 02:18 PM
I have a question about insideout's first post: when you say "increase visibility" are you referring to improving rankings on the words in those elements/attributes? Assuming that's what you mean...
#10
Posted 04 September 2006 - 02:34 PM
The bonus of doing it this way (the right way) is as you say, the human visitor can see a sensible page title and is more likely to click on it.
#11
Posted 04 September 2006 - 02:36 PM
Chris, you should get a T-Shirt with that on
#12
Posted 04 September 2006 - 03:52 PM
#13
Posted 04 September 2006 - 04:11 PM
Having a sitemap is great idea because 1) it helps the SE's get to all your links easily 2) it helps your visitors find their way around. The sitemap is especially useful for sites with a lot of pages, and really any site with pages more than 1 click deep.
Expanding on the sitemap thing - A good sitemap is more than a bunch of links, it is organized and has good content as well.
Ehh? Maybe, maybe not - but it won't hurt. Keep in mind that Google was indexing pages just fine pre-google sitemaps, and that hasn't changed (at least not yet).
Header tags are GOOD -all else being equal, headers can help a tiny bit with the SE's and they are good for Users if used appropriately.
Personally I find headers to be most useful when they are used as intended - (h1 is main header, meaning 1 h1 per page. Then h2, h3 when and if needed for sensical/logical page organization.)
Definitely NOT. Just plain NO.
NO and NO again. First of all you NEVER need to submit any site to the SE's even once- the search "robots" find your site through links that point to your site. If you find that your site is indexed and then un-indexed (as often happens with Google), or that you just aren't getting indexed at all - it is most likely due to a lack of links pointing at ya.
2. What is a good length for a site title?
There is NO magic length. Some people say 70 characters, some less, some more - I say as many as you need - I usually suggest 4-10 words. Tighter is better IMO.
Um, not really - but it is useful in its own right - so shouldn't be ignored. Meta Descriptions can be really helpful for getting people to click on your site in the SERPS - but truly, this tag won't make your site rank any higher.
Yes and No. Most SE's like a good amount of content - So having a lot of good content on the front page (or any page) is good, However placing a bunch of non-sense that is "more than you would normally have" and stuffed with keywords will do exactly the opposite of what you want - so that would be bad news.
NOPE! Link away to any site you find useful- just link smart (no trash, no bad neighborhoods - authority site links are best).
Nope - using title tags, meta tags, copy, headers, alt attributes - that is not spamming the search engines. If your keyword phrases make sense for your site (and they should) then OF COURSE you will want to place them in the title, meta description, meta keywords, on-page copy and in the image alt attributes where it makes sense.
------------
You really missed out on some of the MOST IMPORTANT factors that exist when it comes to rankings - my suggestion - just relax, study what is going on out there, play around with 2 or 5 or 10 sites, take them through a dozen or so [url=http://searchengineland.com/070621-145956.php]Keep the Faith When the Algo Changes[/url], and eventually you'll begin to get a real grip on how this all works.
The truth is there is no magic SEO formula and there just aren't a lot of Yes/No, Black/White answers. When Jill says "I just know" - it's because she does - So you see, once you really get it, that is exactly how it is - you just KNOW.
Leann
Edited by Leann_Pass, 04 September 2006 - 04:17 PM.
#14
Posted 04 September 2006 - 04:58 PM
by watch which way two frogs jump? It is cool!
#15
Posted 04 September 2006 - 11:01 PM
Not frogs. Toads.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









