Are you a Google Analytics enthusiast?
Share and download Custom Google Analytics Reports, dashboards and advanced segments--for FREE!

www.CustomReportSharing.com
From the folks who brought you High Rankings!
More SEO Content
Google Algo Change And George Bush
#1
Posted 06 December 2003 - 12:29 AM
The most interesting thing i have ever found is George Bush's home page coming in first place for keyword "miserable failure"!
Check out
#2
Posted 06 December 2003 - 12:53 AM
Jill
#4
Posted 06 December 2003 - 01:49 AM
I think the first deliberate one, at least the first I heard of, was the Andy "talentless hack" Pressman bomb.
--Torka "but you should only use your powers for good"
#5
Posted 06 December 2003 - 07:50 AM
Why is that still working if, as a hypothetical example, a site about cheese graters is no longer getting a benefit from links on pages about diesel fuel?
#6
Posted 06 December 2003 - 04:02 PM
Jill
#7
Posted 06 December 2003 - 04:07 PM
I think it's safe to assume that if 100 (just an example -- I don't know how many are involved) blogs are pointing to the White House page with the same anchor text for the purpose of a google bomb, not very many of those blogs are of the same theme as the White House page (or appear in the same ODP category), nor are they deemed "expert" pages. So why should those links and their anchor text carry so much weight?
#8
Posted 06 December 2003 - 04:12 PM
Not when the links are being reciprocated... the big thing that has been lost is the power to get major play from link exchanges... these all point to one place with no recip...But I do think it's worth noting that I thought the new algo would have made googlebombing harder to accomplish: we're talking about a bunch of unrelated, non-expert pages using identical anchor text on links to a page that's unrelated to them.
Why is that still working if, as a hypothetical example, a site about cheese graters is no longer getting a benefit from links on pages about diesel fuel?
Guess the way around that is to create a separate domain name inside your site to list links and have the incoming obviously go to the main domain...
I will have to play with that and also see if the links page is put in the robots.txt file whether that helps.
#9
Posted 06 December 2003 - 04:45 PM
What I'm seeing, and what those papers propose, is that links to irrelevant sites shouldn't pass PR.
#10
Posted 06 December 2003 - 06:09 PM
Well, based on what I've been reading...
Guess ya can't believe everything you read!
Plus, how many sites are actually optimized for that phrase? Probably not a whole heck of a lot...if any.
Jill
#11
Posted 06 December 2003 - 06:17 PM
Its in the news!
News: Miserable Failure? Google Trick Says It's Bush - Newsday - Dec 5, 2003
#12
Posted 08 December 2003 - 11:39 AM
#13
Posted 08 December 2003 - 12:43 PM
#14
Posted 08 December 2003 - 01:04 PM
Inbound links with no recips rule!!!
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users








