Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Subscribe to HRA Now!

 



Are you a Google Analytics enthusiast?

Share and download Custom Google Analytics Reports, dashboards and advanced segments--for FREE! 

 



 

 www.CustomReportSharing.com 

From the folks who brought you High Rankings!


Sponsored Content

 

 
 

Photo

Google Algo Change And George Bush


  • Please log in to reply
13 replies to this topic

#1 ajeshnair

ajeshnair

    HR 4

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 150 posts
  • Location:CHENNAI, INDIA

Posted 06 December 2003 - 12:29 AM

I have gone through many keywords after the "FLORIDA" update. We saw many irrelevant search results for keyphrases.

The most interesting thing i have ever found is George Bush's home page coming in first place for keyword "miserable failure"!

Check out

#2 Jill

Jill

    High Rankings Advisor

  • Admin
  • 32,325 posts

Posted 06 December 2003 - 12:53 AM

Just a google bomb. Nothing to do with algorithm changes.

Jill

#3 ajeshnair

ajeshnair

    HR 4

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 150 posts
  • Location:CHENNAI, INDIA

Posted 06 December 2003 - 01:00 AM

Check out this and see the top 10 result

#4 torka

torka

    Vintage Babe

  • Moderator
  • 4,392 posts
  • Location:Triangle area, NC, USA, Earth (usually)

Posted 06 December 2003 - 01:49 AM

Kinda funny, depending on your political leanings... but not really new. People have been Google bombing since 2001, if memory serves. Just get lots of people to set up links containing the desired text, pointing to the desired page, et voilą! If you've got enough friends or the ability to incite the masses, you can have a reasonable amount of fun with stuff like that. :D

I think the first deliberate one, at least the first I heard of, was the Andy "talentless hack" Pressman bomb.

--Torka "but you should only use your powers for good" :thumbup:

#5 qwerty

qwerty

    HR 10

  • Moderator
  • 8,295 posts
  • Location:Somerville, MA

Posted 06 December 2003 - 07:50 AM

But I do think it's worth noting that I thought the new algo would have made googlebombing harder to accomplish: we're talking about a bunch of unrelated, non-expert pages using identical anchor text on links to a page that's unrelated to them.

Why is that still working if, as a hypothetical example, a site about cheese graters is no longer getting a benefit from links on pages about diesel fuel?

#6 Jill

Jill

    High Rankings Advisor

  • Admin
  • 32,325 posts

Posted 06 December 2003 - 04:02 PM

What made you think it would make it harder?

Jill

#7 qwerty

qwerty

    HR 10

  • Moderator
  • 8,295 posts
  • Location:Somerville, MA

Posted 06 December 2003 - 04:07 PM

Well, based on what I've been reading, relevance of linking sites is more important now, and linking campaigns that don't take that into account and insist on specific anchor text are being given less weight.

I think it's safe to assume that if 100 (just an example -- I don't know how many are involved) blogs are pointing to the White House page with the same anchor text for the purpose of a google bomb, not very many of those blogs are of the same theme as the White House page (or appear in the same ODP category), nor are they deemed "expert" pages. So why should those links and their anchor text carry so much weight?

#8 AussieWebmaster

AussieWebmaster

    HR 5

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 505 posts
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY

Posted 06 December 2003 - 04:12 PM

But I do think it's worth noting that I thought the new algo would have made googlebombing harder to accomplish: we're talking about a bunch of unrelated, non-expert pages using identical anchor text on links to a page that's unrelated to them.

Why is that still working if, as a hypothetical example, a site about cheese graters is no longer getting a benefit from links on pages about diesel fuel?

Not when the links are being reciprocated... the big thing that has been lost is the power to get major play from link exchanges... these all point to one place with no recip...

Guess the way around that is to create a separate domain name inside your site to list links and have the incoming obviously go to the main domain...

I will have to play with that and also see if the links page is put in the robots.txt file whether that helps.

#9 qwerty

qwerty

    HR 10

  • Moderator
  • 8,295 posts
  • Location:Somerville, MA

Posted 06 December 2003 - 04:45 PM

As far as I can tell, the problem with many reciprocal links is not that they're reciprocal, but that they're not necessarily relevant. I don't recall reading anything in the TSPR or the Hilltop papers that dealt directly with reciprocal links. Not that those papers are necessarily the answers, but I haven't seen a drop in recognition of reciprocal links between similarly-themed sites.

What I'm seeing, and what those papers propose, is that links to irrelevant sites shouldn't pass PR.

#10 Jill

Jill

    High Rankings Advisor

  • Admin
  • 32,325 posts

Posted 06 December 2003 - 06:09 PM

Well, based on what I've been reading...


Guess ya can't believe everything you read! :naughty:

Plus, how many sites are actually optimized for that phrase? Probably not a whole heck of a lot...if any.

Jill

#11 CGJ

CGJ

    HR 2

  • Active Members
  • PipPip
  • 27 posts
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY

Posted 06 December 2003 - 06:17 PM

Search Now For miserable failure
Its in the news!
News: Miserable Failure? Google Trick Says It's Bush - Newsday - Dec 5, 2003

#12 plantboy

plantboy

    HR 3

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 62 posts
  • Location:Arkansas

Posted 08 December 2003 - 11:39 AM

Google Bombing reminds me that, contrary to what I had always assumed, content is not king. I thought a site had to have relevant content to rank high. Yet whitehouse.gov doesn't contain "miserable" or "failure."

#13 OldWelshGuy

OldWelshGuy

    Work is Fun

  • Moderator
  • 4,713 posts
  • Location:Neath, South Wales, UK

Posted 08 December 2003 - 12:43 PM

Oh and there was me assuming that google was doing a really good job of 'stemming' to relate the whitehouse with miserable failures.

#14 AussieWebmaster

AussieWebmaster

    HR 5

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 505 posts
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY

Posted 08 December 2003 - 01:04 PM

Ah the power of cheese....
Inbound links with no recips rule!!!




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users