Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Subscribe to HRA Now!

 



Are you a Google Analytics enthusiast?

Share and download Custom Google Analytics Reports, dashboards and advanced segments--for FREE! 

 



 

 www.CustomReportSharing.com 

From the folks who brought you High Rankings!


Sponsored Content

 

 
 

Photo
- - - - -

Go Guides Very Expensive These Days


  • Please log in to reply
30 replies to this topic

#1 Scottie

Scottie

    Psycho Mom

  • Admin
  • 6,293 posts
  • Location:Columbia, SC

Posted 26 January 2006 - 10:28 AM

I was getting ready to do some directory submissions for a new site, and went to one of my regulars, Go Guides.

I'll admit it's been a while since I've been there, but I was surprised at the new fees. They seem to have dumped a lot of listings... listings I had in there since 2002 are gone.

Now you have to pay $39.95-$69.95 to list a single site, or join as an editor for a $50 initiation fee and $20 a month for two years (that gives you 120 submissions at 5 sites a month)... if you don't pay up for 2 years, they remove the sites you submitted.

Talk about monetizing a directory! Does anyone pay these prices? I would consider paying someone who was already a paying editor to list my sites, I guess.

#2 SearchRank

SearchRank

    HR 7

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,333 posts
  • Location:Phoenix, AZ

Posted 26 January 2006 - 10:47 AM

Directory submission is getting expensive period. Best of the Web went from $29.95 to $39.95 and now it is $49.95 recurring. Site-Sift went up as well. They are at $49.95.

I just pass this cost onto clients, so yes I pay them if a client wants to be listed. I can still get sites in for free to JoeAnt, Skaffe and Web-Beacon as an editor but it certainly is true that directory submission is becoming more expensive all the time.

With all of this occurring, I only wish DMOZ would start a fee based program for timely submission reviews.

#3 Scottie

Scottie

    Psycho Mom

  • Admin
  • 6,293 posts
  • Location:Columbia, SC

Posted 26 January 2006 - 10:56 AM

I've never even heard of Site-Sift...

#4 Michael Martinez

Michael Martinez

    HR 9

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,805 posts
  • Location:Georgia

Posted 26 January 2006 - 12:00 PM

I don't remember how many listings I had with GoGuides. I seem to be down to 2. They aren't screwing up anything for me, so I'm not concerned about them.

I'm not surprised the directories are monetizing. Eventually, other free directories will pop up and we'll start the cycle all over again.

There was a time when Yahoo! was free.

#5 Jill

Jill

    High Rankings Advisor

  • Admin
  • 32,312 posts

Posted 26 January 2006 - 12:01 PM

What a waste of money. The whole lot of 'em. yuk.gif

Don't fall for it. You shouldn't have to pay for crappy directory links. Might as well throw your money down the drain instead.

#6 Randy

Randy

    Convert Me!

  • Moderator
  • 17,540 posts

Posted 26 January 2006 - 12:32 PM

I agree with Jill. Waste of money for the most part.

Scottie, if you have records of what the rules were when your sites were accepted, assuming you either paid or had an agreement where you didn't have to pay in exchange for moderating, you have cause to force them to re-include those sites.

Having been in business for far too long, you can change the rules. But rules changes only apply to New business. Everything under any old agreements are grandfathered if you can prove what the terms were then.

#7 SearchRank

SearchRank

    HR 7

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,333 posts
  • Location:Phoenix, AZ

Posted 26 January 2006 - 01:02 PM

I wouldn't agree that ALL directories are a waste of money. I am a bit biased as one who operates two directories myself.

I would say that MOST directories are a waste but there are a handful that can give a good quality link. These or course are directories that have some substance to them unlike so many other directories that are either scraper sites, DMOZ clones or contain hundreds and hundreds of unpopulated pages.

#8 qwerty

qwerty

    HR 10

  • Moderator
  • 8,287 posts
  • Location:Somerville, MA

Posted 26 January 2006 - 01:14 PM

Yeah, I agree with David. Some of them are still worthwhile, and it's a quickly approved link that usually gets spidered quickly. General directories can't function as a link campaign on their own, but I still think of them as the quick way to start one.

When did GoGuides change their rates? I last submitted there about two months ago, and I think it was still a one-time $40 fee then.

#9 Jill

Jill

    High Rankings Advisor

  • Admin
  • 32,312 posts

Posted 26 January 2006 - 05:16 PM

It's just plain wrong that they went and removed sites that they previously had listed fine.

Can someone say LookSmart?

#10 Scottie

Scottie

    Psycho Mom

  • Admin
  • 6,293 posts
  • Location:Columbia, SC

Posted 26 January 2006 - 11:59 PM

I don't really care, I won't be submitting there anymore.

But it does irritate me that I was an editor there and really built up a local directory section (not my own sites) and all those hours of work are gone. So much for the "working together to build a great directory" thing.

I just think it's a very poor business model- especially when the footer ads now link to a PPC search engine featuring debt solutions and credit card ads... yuk.

#11 Jill

Jill

    High Rankings Advisor

  • Admin
  • 32,312 posts

Posted 27 January 2006 - 12:06 AM

How weird! Why would they just remove all that?

#12 Scottie

Scottie

    Psycho Mom

  • Admin
  • 6,293 posts
  • Location:Columbia, SC

Posted 27 January 2006 - 12:37 AM

They weren't paid for.

#13 qwerty

qwerty

    HR 10

  • Moderator
  • 8,287 posts
  • Location:Somerville, MA

Posted 27 January 2006 - 12:44 AM

Everything that wasn't paid is just gone? I assume that's a lot.

#14 Scottie

Scottie

    Psycho Mom

  • Admin
  • 6,293 posts
  • Location:Columbia, SC

Posted 27 January 2006 - 08:48 AM

I don't know if everything is, but I was surprised at how empty the cats are for a directory as old as Go Guides.

#15 Leann_Pass

Leann_Pass

    Internet Marketing Consultant

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 671 posts
  • Location:Birmingham Alabama

Posted 27 January 2006 - 09:53 AM

Scottie,
If you want, you can send me the info and I'll add it for you.

Leann




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users