Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Subscribe to HRA Now!

 



Are you a Google Analytics enthusiast?

Share and download Custom Google Analytics Reports, dashboards and advanced segments--for FREE! 

 



 

 www.CustomReportSharing.com 

From the folks who brought you High Rankings!


Sponsored Content

 

 
 

Photo
- - - - -

Links From Different Class C Ips


  • Please log in to reply
26 replies to this topic

#16 chrishirst

chrishirst

    A not so moderate moderator.

  • Moderator
  • 5,880 posts
  • Location:Blackpool UK

Posted 20 November 2005 - 04:10 AM

QUOTE(tempy @ Nov 20 2005, 01:36 AM)
It seems to me that if Google was as aggressive in its filters/penalties that some of these 'other forums' suggest, that the top ten sites on the results would all be sites with only one link to them and every other site would be 'blacklisted'.
View Post

That just about sums it up, it's just a shame that many others aren't prepared to see the visible indications of just how many of the "facts" are obviously not.


QUOTE(tempy @ Nov 20 2005, 01:36 AM)
This whole C Block thing sounds like it should be added to the list of search engine myths, along with keyword density and all those others.
View Post

Yep.

#17 SeanW

SeanW

    HR 1

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 3 posts

Posted 20 November 2005 - 09:00 PM

Another place this came from is the Hilltop paper, one of the authors works for Google:

www.cs.toronto.edu/~georgem/hilltop/

We define two hosts as affiliated if one or both of the following is true:

* They share the same first 3 octets of the IP address.

And, speaking as a guy who deals with networks for a living, it's not a class C, it's a /24. There are many networks that meet the above criteria that aren't a class C (anything with a first octet <192, for instance).

*edit* The idea isn't to penalize sites that come from the same /24, it's to weight their contribution when calculating which of the set is the "authoritative site".

Sean

#18 Jill

Jill

    High Rankings Advisor

  • Admin
  • 32,312 posts

Posted 20 November 2005 - 10:14 PM

Welcome SeanW! bye1.gif

#19 CaliforniaGirl

CaliforniaGirl

    HR 3

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 63 posts
  • Location:Sydney, Australia

Posted 24 November 2005 - 06:12 PM

I agree somewhat with Jill. This is all very speculative. However, I did read the reference to this in the Hilltop paper.

In general I do not think it is too much of an issue, unless it is excessive and unnatural. I have had a recent experience with this causing a site to be banned in Yahoo.

I think it would be a bit rare but it can happen. So I did a little research and wrote a very short article about this. Can I post the URL?? www.seofever.com/knowledge/independent-back-linking-network.htm

My theory anyway...

CaliGirl

#20 matt621

matt621

    HR 1

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 5 posts

Posted 23 December 2005 - 01:45 PM

With all due respect to the previous posters and admin, I disagree with the information given in this thread. I have tested this myself and there is no doubt having links on the same c block IP hurts your ranking. I have moved several sites to separate class c blocks and watched over the past year the PR and SERP improve. You can take that to the bank.

#21 Jill

Jill

    High Rankings Advisor

  • Admin
  • 32,312 posts

Posted 23 December 2005 - 02:02 PM

QUOTE
I have tested this myself and there is no doubt having links on the same c block IP hurts your ranking.


Yes, indeed. If you're trying to trick the engines into thinking that you don't own all the sites in question, then it could be a problem.

But we don't believe that's a good idea in the first place, therefore it shouldn't matter if you're sites are all on the same server.

#22 profitability

profitability

    HR 2

  • Active Members
  • PipPip
  • 25 posts
  • Location:Cincinnati, Ohio

Posted 23 December 2005 - 03:43 PM

Is there an official position from Google or Yahoo on this issue? Any actual statistics?

#23 Michael Martinez

Michael Martinez

    HR 9

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,805 posts
  • Location:Georgia

Posted 23 December 2005 - 04:09 PM

The official position from Google is that they do not -- I repeat -- they DO NOT disregard links coming from the same Class C IP blocks. Google representatives have stated clearly and specifically they are NOT discarding links based on Class C IP addressing.

Anyone who thinks they have seen otherwise is misinterpreting results, because I assure you, I am doing just fine with multiple links from inside a single Class C IP address.

It would be contra-productive for Google to follow everything indicated in the Hilltop paper.

#24 Jill

Jill

    High Rankings Advisor

  • Admin
  • 32,312 posts

Posted 23 December 2005 - 07:26 PM

QUOTE
Is there an official position from Google or Yahoo on this issue? Any actual statistics?


No, why would they have an official position on it? It's really not something for them to comment on. That would be like telling their algo!

Like everything in SEO, it's common sense if you ask me.

#25 Randy

Randy

    Convert Me!

  • Moderator
  • 17,540 posts

Posted 23 December 2005 - 09:22 PM

Welcome Matt ! hi.gif

QUOTE
I have moved several sites to separate class c blocks and watched over the past year the PR and SERP improve.


Over a whole year? eek.gif

Me thinks there may be a bit of confusion over Cause and Effect. There are so many other possibilities that with the details missing I simply cannot accept a blanket statement that the IP change was the root cause. Especially when lots of folks like myself and Michael have evidence pointing to the contrary.

Now if you really wanted to test your theory, move all of those sites back to the same Class C to see if there is an immediate effect. If it's an IP thing, the drop should happen quickly.

#26 Jill

Jill

    High Rankings Advisor

  • Admin
  • 32,312 posts

Posted 23 December 2005 - 09:53 PM

QUOTE
Now if you really wanted to test your theory, move all of those sites back to the same Class C to see if there is an immediate effect. If it's an IP thing, the drop should happen quickly.


That would be a great test!

#27 DanThies

DanThies

    Keyword Super Freak

  • Moderator
  • 865 posts
  • Location:Texas, y'all

Posted 24 December 2005 - 05:02 PM

The way IP addresses are allocated now, having the same /24 or class C block doesn't necessarily imply any kind of affiliation at all. Having the same IP address doesn't even guarantee that two sites are affiliated.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users