Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Subscribe to HRA Now!

 



Are you a Google Analytics enthusiast?

Share and download Custom Google Analytics Reports, dashboards and advanced segments--for FREE! 

 



 

 www.CustomReportSharing.com 

From the folks who brought you High Rankings!


Sponsored Content

 

 
 

Photo
- - - - -

Impact Of Tables On Seo


  • Please log in to reply
54 replies to this topic

#1 Karri

Karri

    HR 5

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 292 posts
  • Location:Alberta, Canada

Posted 16 October 2005 - 10:51 AM

I am designing a website with tables (yes ... ick. Some decade I will find time to learn CSS). For design purposes (or lack of knowing the correct code wink.gif, I used three tables to create my layout, not nested tables but "stacked" tables. ie. three tables running vertically down the page, one on top of the other.

I have one small table for a row of utility buttons and the company logo.
I have another small table beneath for a banner containing graphics.
The 3rd table underneath is the largest one with all of the content and navigation, etc.

Yes, dumb. But it was so easy ... can I now just nest these all into one cell or can I just leave it the way it is ... Will this negatively impact the spiders' ability to crawl this site?

Karri

#2 Randy

Randy

    Convert Me!

  • Moderator
  • 17,540 posts

Posted 16 October 2005 - 10:56 AM

No problems at all for the spider Karri. You can nest them if you need to or not. The choice is up to you.

The only time I've seen spiders have problems with tables, and even this has been a looooooong time ago, was when the page ended up having many multiple nested tables. Where you've got a table, a nest, another nest, another nest, another nest, etc, etc.

Even then, the problem always turned out to be non-standard code, not the use of tables per se. Once the code was cleaned up a bit, the spiders liked even these deeply nested pages just fine.

#3 Jill

Jill

    High Rankings Advisor

  • Admin
  • 32,324 posts

Posted 16 October 2005 - 11:42 AM

The search engines do not now, nor have they ever had a problem with tables. Table away as much as you want as far as SEO is concerned.

(And I've even had multiple nested table with really bad coding many years ago that had no trouble getting indexed by the engines. IT IS NOT A PROBLEM!)

#4 SmellieNellie

SmellieNellie

    HR 6

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 559 posts
  • Location:Wrexham, North Wales

Posted 16 October 2005 - 01:33 PM

The school of thumb that I read re: tables was simply that they can push the content down the page (though not always) thus taking more time for the spider to read the content, not that tables themselves caused problems re: spidering.

Just my penny.gif

#5 Jill

Jill

    High Rankings Advisor

  • Admin
  • 32,324 posts

Posted 16 October 2005 - 02:28 PM

Pushing the content down on the page has no effect on the engines either.

#6 qwerty

qwerty

    HR 10

  • Moderator
  • 8,294 posts
  • Location:Somerville, MA

Posted 16 October 2005 - 03:09 PM

I rail against tables all the time (especially nested tables), but not because of anything related to search engines. I agree with Jill -- they make no difference to the engines.

#7 SmellieNellie

SmellieNellie

    HR 6

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 559 posts
  • Location:Wrexham, North Wales

Posted 16 October 2005 - 05:36 PM

QUOTE
Pushing the content down on the page has no effect on the engines either.


Can you clarify your reasoning on this Jill - so that I can compare it to the teachings I have received?

Thanks.

QUOTE
I rail against tables all the time (especially nested tables)


Qwerty - that's half a story! You can't do that to us! Tell us why!!!! flowers.gif

#8 Scottie

Scottie

    Psycho Mom

  • Admin
  • 6,293 posts
  • Location:Columbia, SC

Posted 16 October 2005 - 05:42 PM

Some people believe the closer to the top or the page the content is, the better.

Others believe that it doesn't matter because the engines take the entire page into account and don't "rate" the content higher in the page any more important than the content lower on the page.

CSS allows you to place content higher on the page, but all engines strip out the code, so the amount of code doesn't seem to have any bearing on indexing or ranking.

No one has any conclusive proof that I've seen either way, but you can certainly see plenty of code-heavy pages in #1 spots as well as code- efficient ones.

#9 Catz

Catz

    HR 5

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 447 posts

Posted 16 October 2005 - 05:44 PM

Using stacked tables isn't dumb at all. In fact, it is smart.

This will make it much easier for you to go back into the pages to maintain them than if you had to go through tables, within tables, within tables, finding the information you wanted to work on or remove...that is where you get yourself into trouble when making modifications.

You absolutely did the right thing by stacking your tables. thumbup1.gif

#10 Scottie

Scottie

    Psycho Mom

  • Admin
  • 6,293 posts
  • Location:Columbia, SC

Posted 16 October 2005 - 05:47 PM

Stacked tables are definitely the way to go. I hadn't used them til Sophie (Sanity) posted her 3-column template over at Cre8asite, but I've used them exclusively since then.

It's so much easier to troubleshoot and make changes when each table is self-contained instead of nested. goodjob.gif

#11 qwerty

qwerty

    HR 10

  • Moderator
  • 8,294 posts
  • Location:Somerville, MA

Posted 16 October 2005 - 05:57 PM

QUOTE(SmellieNellie @ Oct 16 2005, 06:36 PM)
Qwerty - that's half a story!  You can't do that to us!  Tell us why!!!!  flowers.gif
View Post

It's just that tables weren't designed for layout, and nesting tables can cause serious cross-browser compatibility issues. But as I said, none of that matters to search engines.

#12 Jill

Jill

    High Rankings Advisor

  • Admin
  • 32,324 posts

Posted 16 October 2005 - 07:46 PM

QUOTE
Can you clarify your reasoning on this Jill - so that I can compare it to the teachings I have received?


Teachings you have received from whom?

You're welcome to believe whoever you want. I can tell you that they make no difference, but if you're not going to test it yourself then it's up to you to decide who is the most believable in your mind.

#13 Karri

Karri

    HR 5

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 292 posts
  • Location:Alberta, Canada

Posted 16 October 2005 - 09:42 PM

So nice when the solution that makes the most sense is the right one. Then again, that seems to be how SEO works all the way around which is probably what attracts me to it in the first place.

If I had any Strongbow Cider left in the fridge I'd have one right now. It's nice to be right once and a while. cheers.gif Even if I didn't know it at the time wink.gif

Karri

#14 Jill

Jill

    High Rankings Advisor

  • Admin
  • 32,324 posts

Posted 16 October 2005 - 10:10 PM

As long as you use your own common sense, Karri, you'll be right 99% of the time. Not only in SEO, but in everything in life!

appl.gif

#15 SmellieNellie

SmellieNellie

    HR 6

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 559 posts
  • Location:Wrexham, North Wales

Posted 17 October 2005 - 03:59 AM

QUOTE
You're welcome to believe whoever you want.


Yes, I am aware of that Jill.

To be honest with you the only thing I ever 100% believe is my own results, as they are the ones I can see for sure. But there is always a starting point and mine was to take an online course.

As I said sometimes things on here conflict with things that they taught and whilst I will always make up my own mind, I am of the school that I need to know 'why'. Hence my question to you.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users