Sorry if this is redundant, but I had wondered: does the Google aging filter or aging effects bear on new content for, say, a site that's been around for a long time. Or what about new subdomains off an existing, established domain?
Subscribe to HRA Now!
SEO Class in Chicago, IL
Learn How To Optimize Your Website on July 26, 2013
Looking for personalized in-depth SEO training among your peers?
High Rankings is offering a 1-day customized SEO training class in Chicago. Class size is limited so please sign-up now if you want in!
Are you a Google Analytics enthusiast?
Share and download Custom Google Analytics Reports, dashboards and advanced segments--for FREE!
www.CustomReportSharing.com
From the folks who brought you High Rankings!
More SEO Content
International SEM | Social Media | Search Friendly Design | SEO | Paid Search / PPC | Seminars | Forum Threads | Q&A | Copywriting | Keyword Research | Web Analytics / Conversions | Blogging | Dynamic Sites | Linking | SEO Services | Site Architecture | Search Engine Spam | Wrap-ups | Business Issues | HRA Questions | Online Courses
Google's Aging Filter
Started by
lisphacker
, Mar 24 2005 11:04 AM
4 replies to this topic
#2
chrishirst
-
- Moderator
-
- 5,958 posts
A not so moderate moderator.
- Location:Blackpool UK
Posted 24 March 2005 - 12:01 PM
Brand new content on a existing site just fluctuates in and out for a few days.
Sub-domains would probably be treated exactly as a new site would, simply because that is what they are to the SEs.
Sub-domains would probably be treated exactly as a new site would, simply because that is what they are to the SEs.
#3
Randy
-
- Moderator
-
- 17,540 posts
Convert Me!
Posted 24 March 2005 - 02:01 PM
I've not tested subdomains specifically, but I would have to agree 100% with Chris based upon the way the engines normally treat subdomains.
#4
Jill
-
- Admin
-
- 32,379 posts
High Rankings Advisor
Posted 24 March 2005 - 02:47 PM
QUOTE
Sub-domains would probably be treated exactly as a new site would, simply because that is what they are to the SEs.
Actually, unless the loophole is closed, subdomains were actually the way to bust the sandbox. It was all the talk about 6 months ago.
No idea if they "fixed" that or not.
#5
lisphacker
-
- Active Members
-
- 91 posts
HR 3
Posted 24 March 2005 - 04:04 PM
Well, I don't know why it should be considered a loophole though. If the domain is established, and if it's reasonable to assume that the domain owner at the very least endorses any new subdomains, then why shouldn't Google trust it straight away? Sure, it could be someone's kid or something and end up being a whole lot of nothing, but I'm just saying it shouldn't be handicapped, or at least, only minorly by comparison to a brand new domain.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
