Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Subscribe to HRA Now!

 



Are you a Google Analytics enthusiast?

Share and download Custom Google Analytics Reports, dashboards and advanced segments--for FREE! 

 



 

 www.CustomReportSharing.com 

From the folks who brought you High Rankings!


Sponsored Content

 

 
 

Photo

Yahoo-paid Inclusion Causes Site To Be Spidered


  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

#1 firedog

firedog

    HR 2

  • Active Members
  • PipPip
  • 30 posts
  • Location:Israel

Posted 19 December 2004 - 04:40 AM

Hi-

Had a major coporate site that lost all it's pages in the Yahoo Web Index (There was no spam at the site and it was still listed in the Yahoo Directory). Despite repeated attempts over 2-3 months, the "free submission" did not result in any pages being indexed.

After several attempts, I convinced the client to start Paid Inclusion for 6 pages which had fairly important information, lots of links to other pages on the site, and which I also deemed to have potential for high rankings (based on good results in Google).

The six pages immediately started getting good rankings and a modest amount of clicks.

Now after about 6 weeks, Yahoo has, on its own, re-indexed the entire site-hundreds of pages.

I suspect the existence of the PI pages in the index "caused' the spider to re-index the entire site based on the links on the PI pages.

Might be useful to know if you are ever in the same situation.

Danny

#2 Webmaster T

Webmaster T

    HR 2

  • Active Members
  • PipPip
  • 39 posts

Posted 19 December 2004 - 02:21 PM

Hmmm, unless Inclusion has changed since the last time I looked, links aren't followed off the indexed inclusion page. I assumed they were two separate indexes spidered by two different crawlers (UA). It is possible they are now indexing linked pages but I'd be more coinvinced if I knew the crawlers that crawled the pages. Not disputing it happened, just the notion that Inclusion had anything to do with full site indexing. I was under the impression that couldn't happen. Could be any one of Yahoo!'s crawlers (AlltheWeb, Altavista, Inktomi etc) could have been responsible for the site finding it's way back into the Yahoo! index.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users